JTO(O) ASSOCIATION BSNL INDIA IS VERY MUCH THANKFULL TO SRI.PRAHALAD ROY,G.S,AIBSNLEA AND SRI R.VENKATRAMAN,NC MEMBER&PRESIDENT TEPU AND ALSO SRI SUBBURAMAN.NC MEMBER&GENERAL SECRETARY TEPU FOR THEIR COOPERATION GIVEN TO US.I AM HERE REPRODUCING THE LETTER GIVEN BY SRI.PRAHLADRAI,GS AIBSNLEA TO MANAGEMENT FOR YOUR INFORMATION
-------------------------------------------------------------
To
Shri R K Upadhyaya,
The Chairman Cum Managing Director
BSNL
New Delhi.
Sub:- Case of regularization of qualified and trained TTAs now officiating as JTOs.
Ref:- 1)No. AIBSNLEA/CHQ/CMD/2010dt.17-2-2010.
2) No. AIBSNLEA/CHQ/CMD/2010 dt 23-4-2010.
3) No. AIBSNLEA/CHQ/CMD/2010 dt 9-8-2010
4) No. AIBSNLEA/CHQ/CMD/2010 dt.25-5-2011.
In continuation of our letters cited above under reference, it is constraint to bring to your kind notice that the issue regularisation of qualified and trained TTAs now officiating as JTOs not been settled. The qualified and trained TTAs officiating as JTOs in various circles continuously for the past several years These officials stand qualified as JTOs, passing the Screening Test conducted in the year 1999/2000 under JTO Recruitment Rule 1996. No protection was given in the JTO Recruitment Rules-2001, to accommodate TTAs who have already qualified in accordance with the previous RR. A good number of officials qualified as per JTO RR –1996 were given the required pre-appointment training and they are now officiating in the cadre of JTO in various parts of the country for the past six or more years without getting regularized as JTOs,only because of the administrative lapses on the part of BSNL.
They are presently officiating as JTO since the year 2005 after completing the training to the post JTO. These officials are being denied the regular promotion for last 10 years. The total of such qualified officials were approximately 6000.Out of this,3500 were regularized by
diverting vacancies from unfilled DR quota initially and by creating equal number of supernumerary posts later, based on an order passed by the Hon’ble High Court at Chandigarh). Another 2500 are still in wait list. The officials are on wait list for last 10 years.The present situation and fate of these Officiating JTOs,consequent to the orders of Hon.
High Court of Punjab & Hariyana in CWP No.5608 / 2007 and the stand of BSNL management thereafter.(It is to be noted that, the court did not allow the petitioner’s prayer “ to quash the waiting list of 3338 candidates for promotion as JTOs against 35% quota prepared in pursuance of the screening test held on 23-4-2000.” The court also did not consider the petitioners second prayer for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the BSNL to hold the departmental Competitive examination for promotion as JTO afresh) .
But, the above said writ petition was disposed of with a direction to BSNL to “restore the posts already diverted from direct recruitment quota to 35% departmental quota, as
stated by BSNL in its written statement submitted in the court.”Pursuant to the court order, the management committee of BSNL Board immediately rediverted the 3500 JTO posts back to DR quota and ordered to stop further diversion. Also
ordered creation of 3500 supernumerary posts of JTOs to adjust those officials who have already been promoted, as a special measure. The fate of remaining 2500 officials who are
equally qualified and eligible for posting as JTOs , is not clarified or mentioned by the management committee of BSNL Board so far.Vide, item No.3- decision of the Management committee( No.3-9/2007-pers-IV dated 11-11-2008 of Corporate Office) , BSNL wants to ensure that the promotional aspects of those officials who are eligible for consideration under the Recruitment rules of JTOs-2001 are not diminished in any manner. The Company is very much concerned about this group (Petitioners of the said CWP). But the fate of those eligible for consideration under the Recruitment Rule-1996, is not discussed anywhere.We have apprehension that, the BSNL authorities could not properly contest the above Civil Writ Petition in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in the true interest of the Company. A good number of TTAs were qualified in the screening test conducted in April 2000, under the JTO Recruitment Rule 1996. This was the first and only one such test conducted under JTO RR –1996. This is the only channel of promotion extended to TTAs under the 1996 RR. There exists a policy decision of the Management committee of BSNL Board held on 30-3-2001 for diverting sufficient posts of JTOs from 11326 numbers of unfilled DR quota prior to year 2000 to the 35% departmental quota for absorbing those who qualified as per 1996 RR. This was based on the settlement arrived at between the recognized trade unions and the company. It is an admitted fact that, the petitioners of the said CWP No.5608 / 2007 have no
entitlement for the diverted DR posts which remained unfilled between 1996 and 1999. It is also to be noted that, no time- frame was stipulated by any body to restore the diverted posts.
These facts were not properly brought to the notice of the Hon. High Court by the company and hence the Writ petition was disposed of with an order which only did harm to those qualified TTAs/ officiating JTOs waiting for regular JTO posting as per 1996 RR. Even the original petitioners are not benefited, apart from the fact that certain hurdles could be created unnecessarily.
In this context, we earnestly demanded that a detailed inquiry should be conducted to investigate whether any sort of collusion at any stage occurred in the matter of handling of this court case. We have reasons to believe that, an inert attitude/ colluding activities on the part of some higher level officers in BSNL might have resulted in the failure of BSNL ’s case in the High Court of Punjab & Haryana. Three writ petitions on the same matter (similar cases) with the same prayers, filed by staff in Kerala state, were dismissed by the Hon. High Court of Kerala. We also demand to bestow all efforts to give posting to all qualified candidates, the majority of whom are doing the job of JTOs in the officiating capacity for the last several years.
However, a communication has been issued from the corporate office by the AGM (Pers-IV) vide letter No.3-9/2007/Pers-IV(Pt) dated 26-3-2010, which states that, the case is linked with RA No.148/2009 in CWP No.5608/2007 in High Court of Punjab and Haryana and the matter is sub-judice and no action can be taken in this regard.Immediately we informed BSNL that, the contents of the above letter issued by the AGM
(Pers-IV) was incorrect and misguiding with regard to the matter of one-time up-gradation of qualified TTAs as JTOs. No court of law has ever issued any order barring BSNL from upgradation of posts or amendment of RRs etc. The Suggestions put forward by this Association and the trade union, BSNLEU, in the matter of regularization, were not against standing orders of any of the court of law in the country and the question of sub-judice does not arise , as
nobody has challenged these suggestions in court of law. Once the matter is settled amicably,all the pending court cases will become in fructuous and will be withdrawn automatically.
If at all, any contempt of court petition remains pending in the court of law against CMD of BSNL in this matter, it is a result of colluding activities already done by certain
group of officers in his own office having vested interests for obvious reasons . This is a matter that needs investigation by a top / independent vigilance group and the culprits in side should be booked. If the officers concerned in the corporate office had handled the case properly and judiciously by projecting the true interest of the company without favoring a particular influenced group, the question of a contempt of court against CMD would not have arisen on this account.
Hence we demands in this matter as follows:-
1) Do the immediate needful to settle the matter amicably.
2) Now the contempt of court case pending in the High court of Hariyana, against BSNL, is unnecessarily got postponed and dragged like any thing by the BSNL itself in collusion with the vested interest groups (opposite party) only to delay and deny justice to the qualified and officiating JTOs. (We are sure that the BSNL management can very well close this case immediately, by properly presenting
it’s legally valid stand that, it has got all powers to amend RR or to create supernumerary posts or to upgrade any number of posts as per requirement. It appears that, instead of upholding its powers, the company shows a tendency to
yield unnecessarily before the illogical claims of a vested group as per a predesigned scenario prepared by somebody and thereby torpedo the legitimate and genuine demands raised by this association.).
3) Do away with the present inert attitude of the Company in the matter of regularization of qualified TTAs as JTOs. and complete the process in a time bound manner.
4) Convene a meeting of all concerned at appropriate level to arrive at a logical/ workable solution., either by amending the RR or by one time up-gradation of posts.
5) Do not permit anybody to manipulate things in favor of some vested interest groups.
6) Do not conduct any further promotion tests of any kind from Gr-C to JTO till all the qualified and trained group, officiating as JTOs for the past several years are
fully regularized.
7) The suggestion given by us is economically viable as the up-gradation does not involve additional expenditure.
We therefore request you to kindly intervene in the matter and protect the future of 2500 qualified and officiating JTOs who have already proved their competency.
Thanking you,
Yours Sincerely,
-sd-
(Prahlad Rai)
General Secretary
Copy to: The Director (HR), BSNL, New Delhi
2011/09/28
SNATTA LETTER TO BSNL
No. SNATTA/Departmental JTO Exam-2.
To
Shri A.K. Garg
Director (HR)
BSNL
Bharat Sanchar Bhavan
New Delhi
Reference: Corporate office letter no.5-4/2004/Pers.IV dated 13th May, 2004
& Minutes of the 25th National Council (Agenda point 9.7).
Subject: Cancellation of TTA to JTO officiating promotions and conduct of
JTO departmental exam, regarding.
Dear Sir
The TTA’s are given officiating promotions to JTO cadre as per the agreement
reached between the then recognized union NFTE and BSNL management
in the 5th National Council meeting. The eligibility of these TTAs have since
then been quashed by the Honurable High Court of Punjab and Haryana,
Chandigarh consequently BSNL board in its 104th meeting has cancelled
further diversion of JTO posts.
The continuance of officiating promotions to these TTAs is not correct as
the agreement reached in the 5th NC stands null and void due the decision of
BSNL board. Moreover in the 25th NC meeting held on 24th June, 2011 under
your Chairmanship has denied the officiating promotions to the TTAs who
are otherwise eligible to appear for JTO departmental exam citing the non
availability of such provision under JTO RR-2001 (refer agenda point 9.7 of
25th NCM).
Thus I request you to immediately cancel the officiating promotions given to
the TTAs as per the earlier arrangement and conduct the JTO departmental
exam under 35% quota without further delay as there is no legal hurdle in
conducting the same. The conduct of JTO departmental exam will rest the
question of officiating promotions any further. This will further create the
opportunities for the qualified and motivated work force who are otherwise
feeling let down for the want of promotions for last over 7- 10 years.
Yours truly
Dharmendra Verma
General Secretary
Copy to: Shri R.K. Upadhayay, Chairman Cum Managing Director, BSNL.
To
Shri A.K. Garg
Director (HR)
BSNL
Bharat Sanchar Bhavan
New Delhi
Reference: Corporate office letter no.5-4/2004/Pers.IV dated 13th May, 2004
& Minutes of the 25th National Council (Agenda point 9.7).
Subject: Cancellation of TTA to JTO officiating promotions and conduct of
JTO departmental exam, regarding.
Dear Sir
The TTA’s are given officiating promotions to JTO cadre as per the agreement
reached between the then recognized union NFTE and BSNL management
in the 5th National Council meeting. The eligibility of these TTAs have since
then been quashed by the Honurable High Court of Punjab and Haryana,
Chandigarh consequently BSNL board in its 104th meeting has cancelled
further diversion of JTO posts.
The continuance of officiating promotions to these TTAs is not correct as
the agreement reached in the 5th NC stands null and void due the decision of
BSNL board. Moreover in the 25th NC meeting held on 24th June, 2011 under
your Chairmanship has denied the officiating promotions to the TTAs who
are otherwise eligible to appear for JTO departmental exam citing the non
availability of such provision under JTO RR-2001 (refer agenda point 9.7 of
25th NCM).
Thus I request you to immediately cancel the officiating promotions given to
the TTAs as per the earlier arrangement and conduct the JTO departmental
exam under 35% quota without further delay as there is no legal hurdle in
conducting the same. The conduct of JTO departmental exam will rest the
question of officiating promotions any further. This will further create the
opportunities for the qualified and motivated work force who are otherwise
feeling let down for the want of promotions for last over 7- 10 years.
Yours truly
Dharmendra Verma
General Secretary
Copy to: Shri R.K. Upadhayay, Chairman Cum Managing Director, BSNL.
2011/09/24
fr22(1)a(i)
Telecommunication Employees Progressive Union
(Registration No.2629CNI)
Central Head Quarters
Rtn.PHF.R.Venkataraman
Working President, TEPU CHQ,
Member, Staff Side, BSNL National Council.
Ref: TEPUCHQ / OffgJTO
Date: 21.9.2011
To,
Sri.R.K.Upadhyaya,
Chairman & Managing Director,
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,
New Delhi 110 001.
Sir,
Sub:
Implementation of FR 22(1) (a) (i) benefits by complying the orders of CAT Principal Bench
Case of Officiating JTOs.
We invite your personal intervention on the age old issue that is pending settlement for long. Every officer
in the Corporate Office is seized of the issue and aware of the genuineness of the claim. Due to obvious
reasons, in spite of repeated demands from almost BSNL Non Executive and Executives Unions, demand
in the forum of National Council, it is a pity; the management maintains its silence. We once again refer it
to you hoping that you will personally look into the merit of the issue and settle it.
As of today, about 1900 TTAs qualified and imparted with Phase I (some of them Phase II training
partially) training are deployed to officiate as JTOs. They continue the discharge all the functions of JTOs
for several years (more than 8 years). However, the management restricted their payment by invoking
provisions under FR 35.
CAT, Ernakulam delivered Judgment to grant the JTO Pay Scale to Officiating JTOs. However, BSNL
management implemented the verdict of CAT, limiting it to Officiating JTOs of Kerala Circle, that too with
a condition that the payment is subject to the final outcome of the case.
When the Staff Side raised the issue in the 24th National Council Meeting held on 31.8.2010, the Official
Side held “The case in OA No.1282/2010 is before the CAT Principal Bench, the entire matter is under
judicial scrutiny, the issue can be settled only after the decision of the courts.”
Now CAT Principal Bench, New Delhi while dismissing the Review Petition filed by BSNL has
ordered to implement its order dated 26.8.2010 within a period of six months from 5.9.2011.
Sir, you may agree that utilizing a group of officials (entitled to be absorbed as JTOs since they have
been imparted with Phase I training) as JTOs without paying them the Pay of JTO is an attempt of labour
exploitation. Since we are aware of the predicaments the management faces in regularizing them, we do
not venture to term this as an exploitation resulting into unfair labour practice.
In consideration of the facts of the case, we request your indulgence for suitable directive and instructions
for uniform implementation of the verdict of CAT Ernakulam and thus extend the hands of Justice to
Officiating JTOs.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
(R.Venkataraman)
Wkg.President & Member Staff Side
(Registration No.2629CNI)
Central Head Quarters
Rtn.PHF.R.Venkataraman
Working President, TEPU CHQ,
Member, Staff Side, BSNL National Council.
Ref: TEPUCHQ / OffgJTO
Date: 21.9.2011
To,
Sri.R.K.Upadhyaya,
Chairman & Managing Director,
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,
New Delhi 110 001.
Sir,
Sub:
Implementation of FR 22(1) (a) (i) benefits by complying the orders of CAT Principal Bench
Case of Officiating JTOs.
We invite your personal intervention on the age old issue that is pending settlement for long. Every officer
in the Corporate Office is seized of the issue and aware of the genuineness of the claim. Due to obvious
reasons, in spite of repeated demands from almost BSNL Non Executive and Executives Unions, demand
in the forum of National Council, it is a pity; the management maintains its silence. We once again refer it
to you hoping that you will personally look into the merit of the issue and settle it.
As of today, about 1900 TTAs qualified and imparted with Phase I (some of them Phase II training
partially) training are deployed to officiate as JTOs. They continue the discharge all the functions of JTOs
for several years (more than 8 years). However, the management restricted their payment by invoking
provisions under FR 35.
CAT, Ernakulam delivered Judgment to grant the JTO Pay Scale to Officiating JTOs. However, BSNL
management implemented the verdict of CAT, limiting it to Officiating JTOs of Kerala Circle, that too with
a condition that the payment is subject to the final outcome of the case.
When the Staff Side raised the issue in the 24th National Council Meeting held on 31.8.2010, the Official
Side held “The case in OA No.1282/2010 is before the CAT Principal Bench, the entire matter is under
judicial scrutiny, the issue can be settled only after the decision of the courts.”
Now CAT Principal Bench, New Delhi while dismissing the Review Petition filed by BSNL has
ordered to implement its order dated 26.8.2010 within a period of six months from 5.9.2011.
Sir, you may agree that utilizing a group of officials (entitled to be absorbed as JTOs since they have
been imparted with Phase I training) as JTOs without paying them the Pay of JTO is an attempt of labour
exploitation. Since we are aware of the predicaments the management faces in regularizing them, we do
not venture to term this as an exploitation resulting into unfair labour practice.
In consideration of the facts of the case, we request your indulgence for suitable directive and instructions
for uniform implementation of the verdict of CAT Ernakulam and thus extend the hands of Justice to
Officiating JTOs.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
(R.Venkataraman)
Wkg.President & Member Staff Side
2011/09/19
SAMPITRODA COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS VRS IN BSNL
BSNL proposal: VRS based on guidelines of the Dept. of Public Enterprises.
Eligibility: Employees of age above 45 years can opt for VRS
JAC meets on 21.9.2011 to decide further course of action over curtailed facilities & VRS proposal
BSNL invites unions on different dates to discuss the contemplated VRS
WE ARE YES, BSNL's stand on VRS. Note on the scheme tabled before
Hon'ble MOC & IT
Eligibility: Employees of age above 45 years can opt for VRS
JAC meets on 21.9.2011 to decide further course of action over curtailed facilities & VRS proposal
BSNL invites unions on different dates to discuss the contemplated VRS
WE ARE YES, BSNL's stand on VRS. Note on the scheme tabled before
Hon'ble MOC & IT
2011/09/09
JAC CALL ONE DAY DHARNA ON 14/09/2011
The Joint Action Committe BSNL gave a call for a one day DHARNA in front of all PGM/CGM and Corporate offices at New Delhi on 14/09/2011 (i.e) monday and all are requested to participate and make it a grand success.
N Kabeerdas .Y.Ramakrishna Rao and M Rajender Reddy met sri P.ASOKBABU DGS BSNL EU today at CGM's union office 9th floor, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh at14.00 hrs and deeply discussed about implementation of FR 22(1)(a)(1) judgement ,and gave a Judgement copy to sri P.Asokbabu
N Kabeerdas .Y.Ramakrishna Rao and M Rajender Reddy met sri P.ASOKBABU DGS BSNL EU today at CGM's union office 9th floor, Hyderabad , Andhra Pradesh at14.00 hrs and deeply discussed about implementation of FR 22(1)(a)(1) judgement ,and gave a Judgement copy to sri P.Asokbabu
2011/09/08
BSNLMRS WITHOUT VOUCHER / LTC CORTAILING IN BSNL
As per corporate office Lr no 7-8/2010/EF/Part/1- dated 5-9-2011.
Expenditure control in BSNL . Facility with drawn without voucher BSNL MRS
Freezing of LTC and with drawl of Leave encashment.
The JAC had an emergency meeting for stopping anti workers decision of BSNL on 7/9/11 at new Delhi . They also planned one day DHARNA in front of all BSNL PGM/CGM and Corporate office at NEW DELHI.
All our members are requested to participate actively in the agitation programme given by JAC......
Our central co coordinator addressed the gathering in Saroor nagar xge on 7/9/11 at Hyderabad AP.
Expenditure control in BSNL . Facility with drawn without voucher BSNL MRS
Freezing of LTC and with drawl of Leave encashment.
The JAC had an emergency meeting for stopping anti workers decision of BSNL on 7/9/11 at new Delhi . They also planned one day DHARNA in front of all BSNL PGM/CGM and Corporate office at NEW DELHI.
All our members are requested to participate actively in the agitation programme given by JAC......
Our central co coordinator addressed the gathering in Saroor nagar xge on 7/9/11 at Hyderabad AP.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Principal Bench FR 22(1)(a)(1) JUDGEMENT
FLASH FLASH FLASH .........ARISE AWAKE AND STOP NOT TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED
The central co ordinator is continuously in contact with all the Unions/Associations leaders and mainly
sri.V.A.N.NAMBOODRI
sri.P.ABHIMANYU .sri.P.ASOKABABU .BSNL EU .. sri.R.VENKATRAMAN .sri.SUBBURAMAN .TEPU ...
sri.SURESHKUMAR . BSNL MS
sri.PRAHALAD RAI .AIBSNL EA
and other National Council Members to implement the Judgement with in 6 weeks as per time given by Hon'ble CAT PB .DB NEW DELHI ............
Our association is sincerely thankful to all the leaders/members who are supporting directly or indirectly to get this judgement .......
and special thanks to Mrs.RANICHHABRA counsel for our case....
JUDGEMENT COPY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH
NEW DELHI
Review Application No.125 of 2011
Misc. Application No.3082 of 2010
in
Original Application No.1282 of 2010
This the 5th day of September, 2011
HON BLE SHRI JUSTICE V. K. BALI, CHAIRMAN
HON BLE DR. RAMESH CHANDRA PANDA, MEMBER (A)
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & others Applicants
( By Shri Sameer Aggarwal, Advocate )
Versus
BSNL Officers Association Regd.) & Anr. Respondents
( By Mrs. Rani Chhabra, Advocate )
O R D E R
Justice V. K. Bali, Chairman:
The positive case as set up by the applicants in the Original Application was that the relief asked for by them would be covered by the judgment of this Tribunal in Ernakulam Bench in the matter of M. V. Salilkumar & others v Chairman & Managing Director & others (TA No.84/2008 and connected matters, decided on 15.7.2009). During the course of hearing, no dispute was raised that the relief asked for by the applicants would be different from the one that was accorded by the Bench at Ernakulam, or that the facts of the present case would be in any way different from the one subject matter of decision in TA No.84/2008 and connected matters decided by the Ernakulam Bench. The only dispute raised was that once, a writ against the order of the Tribunal in Ernakulam had been filed in the Kerala High Court, the matter be kept pending. Paras 2 and 3 of the order passed by us on 26.8.2010 read as follows:
2. Inasmuch as, present matter is covered in favour of the applicants by the decision of Ernakulam Bench of this Tribunal in the matter of M.V. Salilakumar & Ors. V/s. The Chairman & Managing Director & Ors., (TA No.84/2008 and other connected TAs decided on 15.07.2009), there will be no need to give facts in detail.
3. We have gone through the judgment passed by Ernakulam Bench of this Tribunal and are in respectful agreement with the same. We are, however, informed that against the judgment aforesaid, respondents have filed two writs in the Hon ble High Court of Kerala and the same have been admitted, but in none of these two writs, stay has been granted. If perhaps, the respondents would have obtained the stay, we may have adjourned this case sine die. But, inasmuch as, once there is no stay and, therefore, the applicants in TAs are getting the relief granted to them, there will be no need whatsoever to stay the proceedings of this case.
The order is oral passed in the presence of counsel representing the parties. Against our orders a writ petition bearing WP(C) No.1339/2011 came to be filed before the Delhi High Court by the respondents in the OA, which has been disposed of vide orders dated 28.2.2011. The order passed by the High Court reads as follows:
Heard Mr. Sameer Aggarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
It is submitted by him that the tribunal has erroneously placed reliance on the decision rendered by the Ernakulam Bench in the matter of M. V. Salilkumar & Ors. v. The Chairman & Manging Director & Ors., whereas the factual matrix is absolutely different and the said decision is not applicable to the case at hand.
On a perusal of the order passed by the tribunal, we do not perceive that this stand has been taken before the tribunal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the stand was taken but the same has not been adverted to in the order.
Regard being had to the aforesaid submission, we are inclined to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an application for review under Section 22(F) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
We may hasten to add that we have not dwelled upon the merits of the contentions as we have granted liberty to file an application for review.
With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition as well as the application stand disposed of.
Perusal of the order passed by the High Court would clearly manifest that from perusal of the order passed by us it could not be perceived that the stand as taken in the High Court that no reliance could be placed upon the decision of the Ernakulam Bench, as the factual matrix of the case in hand and that of one before the Ernakulam Bench were entirely different, was taken before the Tribunal in the OA. Learned counsel for the petitioners before the High Court would, however, submit that such a stand was taken, but the same was not even adverted to by the Tribunal. It is in consideration of the plea raised by the counsel for petitioners before the High Court that such stand had been taken but not adverted to by the Tribunal, that the petitioners were granted liberty to file review before the Tribunal. Hence, present application seeking review of our order.
2. We have gone through the contents of the review application. It is unfortunate that for some time past a tendency is growing in the litigants that instead of contesting the matter on legal and factual issues, which is their right, by often twisting the facts before the Hon ble High Court, they are able to secure favourable orders, even though for limited duration. The facts of the present case would demonstrate that the review applicants have indeed indulged in misadventure by being totally indiscriminate and by twisting facts, bordering on falsehood. In para 2(a) to (c) of the review application, facts leading to filing of the OA have been mentioned. Sub-paras (d) to (i) of para 2 read as follows:
d) Inadvertently and by mistake, Kerala Circle of the Respondents Corporation granted benefit of pay applicable to JTO (Group-B, Gazetted) to the Officiating Local JTOs, who had been promoted on adhoc basis from TTA (Group-C Cadre) post, which excess pay was later attempted to be recovered by way of an office order against which some of officiating local JTOs in Kerala Circle filed Writ Petition No.28349/2005 and other Writ Petitions before the Hon ble Kerala High Court wherein they claimed fixation of pay under Fundamental Rule 22(1)(a)(i) in the scale of pay applicable to the post of JTO (Group-B Gazetted) and objected to the recovery which Writ Petitions were decided in their favour by a Hon ble Single Judge of the Hon ble Kerala High Court. The Respondent Corporation appealed against the above decision of the Hon ble Single Judge to the Hon ble Division Bench of Kerala High Court by way of Writ Appeal No.1735/2006 and others in which the Hon ble Division Bench while setting aside the decision of the Hon ble Single Judge directed the Respondent Corporation to give an opportunity of being heard to the Writ Respondents regarding fixation of pay. Accordingly, the Respondent Corporation granted opportunity of hearing and the Orders dated 20.11.2007 and 04.12.2007 rejected the claim of the Officiating Local JTOs regarding fixation of their pay as applicable to JTO.
e) Some of the Officiating Local JTOs again filed writ petitions against Orders dated 20.11.20078 and 04.12.2007 before the Hon ble single Judge of the Hon ble Kerala High Court, which writ petitions were later transferred to the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal and the transferred petitions came to be decided in favour of the applicants by the Hon ble Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal vide decision dated 15.07.2009 in the case of M.V. Salilkumar & Ors. Vs. The Chairman & Managing Director & Ors. It is pertinent to submit here that the Hon ble Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal has simply followed the decision of the Hon ble Single Judge passed earlier which decision was set aside by the Hon ble Division Bench of the Hon ble Kerala High Court but did not independently apply its mind to the facts and law as is evident from para 10 of the judgment dated 15.07.2009.
f) Aggrieved by the judgment dated 15.07.2009 of the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal the Respondent Corporation filed Writ Petition Nos.8077/2010 and 7723/2010 before the Hon ble Kerala High Court which Writ Petitions have been admitted by the Hon ble High Court. However, no stay of the decision appealed against was granted by the Hon ble Kerala High Court.
g) Claiming parity and seeking extension of benefit granted vide Judgment dated 15.07.2009 by the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal, the Applicants herein, filed Original Application No.3213 of 2009 before the Hon ble Tribunal which Original Application No.3213 of 2009 was disposed of at the admission stage itself, vide Order dated 11.11.2009 by the Hon ble Tribunal directing the Respondent Corporation to examine whether the cases of the Applicants are covered by the aforesaid decision of the Ernakulam Bench and pass appropriate orders accordingly, and if it is found otherwise to pass a reasoned, and speaking order in the matter, under intimation to the Applicants.
h) Pursuant to the directions issued by the Hon ble Tribunal in its Order dated 11.11.2009 the Respondent Corporation examined the matter and passed reasoned and speaking order dated 05.01.2010 inter alia, on the ground that the officiating officers are not fulfilling the eligibility condition vis-`-vis the prescribed pre-appointed training as per Rule 5(2) of the JTO Recruitment Rules, 1996 they are entitled for pay fixation under FR-35 as per the provisions of GOI Order 3 below FR 35, DOPT OM No.1/10/89-Estt.(Pay-I) dated 22.10.1990; that the Respondent Corporation has not accepted the judgment of the Hon ble Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal and challenged the same by way of Writ Petitions before the Hon ble Kerala High Court and expressed its regret that it will not be possible for the Respondent to concede the request of the Applicants for fixing the pay of officiating JTOs without restriction under FR 35.
i) Aggrieved by the Order dated 05.01.2010 passed by the Respondent, the Applicants filed Original Application No.1282 of 2010 before the Hon ble Tribunal. The Respondent Corporation filed its counter to the original application claiming that the fixation of pay is to be done under Fundamental Rule 35 but not under Fundamental Rule 22(1)(a)(i) as claimed by the Applicants. It was specifically prayed in the counter that the matter may be kept in abeyance in view of the Respondent Corporation filing Writ Petitions before the Hon ble Kerala High Court which have been admitted and are pending for adjudication to which the Hon ble Tribunal did not agree but simply followed the decision dated 15.07.2009 of the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal without appreciating that the facts in the present O.A. are different from the facts of the O.A. decided by the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal.
As stated earlier the pay of the applicants before the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal was initially fixed on their promotion, applying FR 22(I)(a)(1) and their carry home pay was increased by Rs.1,500/- per month. On the mistake being realized the BSNL directed the refixation of the applicants before the Ernakulam bench of the Hon ble Tribunal pay under FR 35 by which maximum amount of Rs,1000/- was to be given above the basic pay and not in the scale of pay of the post of JTO. The amount wrongly paid was ordered to be recovered. Being aggrieved of this action the applicants before the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal had approached the Hon ble High Court of Kerala and wee granted interim stay.
As against this in the case of the Applicants before the Delhi Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal, since the applicants were not satisfying the requirements stipulated under the JTO Recruitment Rules of 1996, their pay was rightly fixed under FR 35. Thus, the applicants before the Delhi Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal are on a completely different pedestal with no similarity whatsoever with the applicants before the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal.
It is only towards the end of para 2(i) at the bottom of page 7 that, for the first time, it is mentioned that as the applicants before the Principal Bench of the Tribunal did not satisfy the requirements stipulated under the JTO Recruitment Rules of 1996, their pay was rightly fixed under FR-35, and thus they would be on a completely different pedestal with no similarity whatsoever with the applicants before the Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal. It is surprising to note that if it was the case of the review applicants that the facts leading to filing of the TA culminating into decision by the Ernakulam Bench are entirely different, why at every stage, be it in the OA or the review application, it has been time and again mentioned that the respondents (review applicants) had not accepted the judgment of the Ernakulam Bench and had, therefore, filed a writ against the same. It could well be said that in the case before the Ernakulam Bench and the writ that has been filed in the Kerala High Court the facts are entirely different and the said judgment would have no relevance whatsoever in deciding the controversy in issue. Such was never the case of the respondents. In the order impugned in the OA which came to be passed pursuant to directions given by us on 11.11.2009 in OA No.3213/2009 it has been clearly mentioned in clause (v) that BSNL has not accepted the judgment dated 15.07.2009 of Hon ble CAT, Ernakulam and has initiated necessary action for challenging the said judgment before the Hon ble High Court of Kerala . What really surprises us is that what was the need of saying so if the facts of the case in hand and the one subject matter of decision by the Ernakulam Bench were different. We are not making a mention of the reply filed on behalf of the respondents in the OA as the same would unnecessarily burden the judgment. We would rather prefer to annex with this judgment as Annexure-A copy of the reply filed on behalf of the respondents in the OA, which we order to be read as part of the judgment. There is not a single sentence mentioned therein that the facts of the case before the Ernakulam Bench and the one before us would be entirely different.
3. Why we have observed that of late a tendency is growing amongst the litigants to secure orders by hook or by crook is that this is not the only case where the respondents have sought and have been permitted to file review on mis-stating the facts before the Hon ble High Court. We have found from our experience that in some of the writs filed against our orders also a plea is raised that certain points were urged before the Tribunal, but it did not deal with the same. More often than not, on such statement, permission is sought and granted to move application for review. With a view to obviate such situation, we would hereafter specifically state in our orders that no points other than mentioned therein were raised by the learned counsel representing the parties.
4. The review application is dismissed.
M.A. No.3082/2010
This is an application seeking execution of the order dated 26.8.2010 passed in the OA. It was kept pending as against our order aforesaid, as permitted by the Hon ble High Court in the writ petition filed against the same, the respondents were allowed to make application for review, which has been dismissed by us today. That being so, we order the respondents to implement our order dated 26.8.2010 within a period of six weeks from today.
( Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda ) ( V. K. Bali )
Member (A) Chairman
/as/
Ur.N . KABEER DAS
The central co ordinator is continuously in contact with all the Unions/Associations leaders and mainly
sri.V.A.N.NAMBOODRI
sri.P.ABHIMANYU .sri.P.ASOKABABU .BSNL EU .. sri.R.VENKATRAMAN .sri.SUBBURAMAN .TEPU ...
sri.SURESHKUMAR . BSNL MS
sri.PRAHALAD RAI .AIBSNL EA
and other National Council Members to implement the Judgement with in 6 weeks as per time given by Hon'ble CAT PB .DB NEW DELHI ............
Our association is sincerely thankful to all the leaders/members who are supporting directly or indirectly to get this judgement .......
and special thanks to Mrs.RANICHHABRA counsel for our case....
JUDGEMENT COPY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH
NEW DELHI
Review Application No.125 of 2011
Misc. Application No.3082 of 2010
in
Original Application No.1282 of 2010
This the 5th day of September, 2011
HON BLE SHRI JUSTICE V. K. BALI, CHAIRMAN
HON BLE DR. RAMESH CHANDRA PANDA, MEMBER (A)
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & others Applicants
( By Shri Sameer Aggarwal, Advocate )
Versus
BSNL Officers Association Regd.) & Anr. Respondents
( By Mrs. Rani Chhabra, Advocate )
O R D E R
Justice V. K. Bali, Chairman:
The positive case as set up by the applicants in the Original Application was that the relief asked for by them would be covered by the judgment of this Tribunal in Ernakulam Bench in the matter of M. V. Salilkumar & others v Chairman & Managing Director & others (TA No.84/2008 and connected matters, decided on 15.7.2009). During the course of hearing, no dispute was raised that the relief asked for by the applicants would be different from the one that was accorded by the Bench at Ernakulam, or that the facts of the present case would be in any way different from the one subject matter of decision in TA No.84/2008 and connected matters decided by the Ernakulam Bench. The only dispute raised was that once, a writ against the order of the Tribunal in Ernakulam had been filed in the Kerala High Court, the matter be kept pending. Paras 2 and 3 of the order passed by us on 26.8.2010 read as follows:
2. Inasmuch as, present matter is covered in favour of the applicants by the decision of Ernakulam Bench of this Tribunal in the matter of M.V. Salilakumar & Ors. V/s. The Chairman & Managing Director & Ors., (TA No.84/2008 and other connected TAs decided on 15.07.2009), there will be no need to give facts in detail.
3. We have gone through the judgment passed by Ernakulam Bench of this Tribunal and are in respectful agreement with the same. We are, however, informed that against the judgment aforesaid, respondents have filed two writs in the Hon ble High Court of Kerala and the same have been admitted, but in none of these two writs, stay has been granted. If perhaps, the respondents would have obtained the stay, we may have adjourned this case sine die. But, inasmuch as, once there is no stay and, therefore, the applicants in TAs are getting the relief granted to them, there will be no need whatsoever to stay the proceedings of this case.
The order is oral passed in the presence of counsel representing the parties. Against our orders a writ petition bearing WP(C) No.1339/2011 came to be filed before the Delhi High Court by the respondents in the OA, which has been disposed of vide orders dated 28.2.2011. The order passed by the High Court reads as follows:
Heard Mr. Sameer Aggarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
It is submitted by him that the tribunal has erroneously placed reliance on the decision rendered by the Ernakulam Bench in the matter of M. V. Salilkumar & Ors. v. The Chairman & Manging Director & Ors., whereas the factual matrix is absolutely different and the said decision is not applicable to the case at hand.
On a perusal of the order passed by the tribunal, we do not perceive that this stand has been taken before the tribunal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the stand was taken but the same has not been adverted to in the order.
Regard being had to the aforesaid submission, we are inclined to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an application for review under Section 22(F) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
We may hasten to add that we have not dwelled upon the merits of the contentions as we have granted liberty to file an application for review.
With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition as well as the application stand disposed of.
Perusal of the order passed by the High Court would clearly manifest that from perusal of the order passed by us it could not be perceived that the stand as taken in the High Court that no reliance could be placed upon the decision of the Ernakulam Bench, as the factual matrix of the case in hand and that of one before the Ernakulam Bench were entirely different, was taken before the Tribunal in the OA. Learned counsel for the petitioners before the High Court would, however, submit that such a stand was taken, but the same was not even adverted to by the Tribunal. It is in consideration of the plea raised by the counsel for petitioners before the High Court that such stand had been taken but not adverted to by the Tribunal, that the petitioners were granted liberty to file review before the Tribunal. Hence, present application seeking review of our order.
2. We have gone through the contents of the review application. It is unfortunate that for some time past a tendency is growing in the litigants that instead of contesting the matter on legal and factual issues, which is their right, by often twisting the facts before the Hon ble High Court, they are able to secure favourable orders, even though for limited duration. The facts of the present case would demonstrate that the review applicants have indeed indulged in misadventure by being totally indiscriminate and by twisting facts, bordering on falsehood. In para 2(a) to (c) of the review application, facts leading to filing of the OA have been mentioned. Sub-paras (d) to (i) of para 2 read as follows:
d) Inadvertently and by mistake, Kerala Circle of the Respondents Corporation granted benefit of pay applicable to JTO (Group-B, Gazetted) to the Officiating Local JTOs, who had been promoted on adhoc basis from TTA (Group-C Cadre) post, which excess pay was later attempted to be recovered by way of an office order against which some of officiating local JTOs in Kerala Circle filed Writ Petition No.28349/2005 and other Writ Petitions before the Hon ble Kerala High Court wherein they claimed fixation of pay under Fundamental Rule 22(1)(a)(i) in the scale of pay applicable to the post of JTO (Group-B Gazetted) and objected to the recovery which Writ Petitions were decided in their favour by a Hon ble Single Judge of the Hon ble Kerala High Court. The Respondent Corporation appealed against the above decision of the Hon ble Single Judge to the Hon ble Division Bench of Kerala High Court by way of Writ Appeal No.1735/2006 and others in which the Hon ble Division Bench while setting aside the decision of the Hon ble Single Judge directed the Respondent Corporation to give an opportunity of being heard to the Writ Respondents regarding fixation of pay. Accordingly, the Respondent Corporation granted opportunity of hearing and the Orders dated 20.11.2007 and 04.12.2007 rejected the claim of the Officiating Local JTOs regarding fixation of their pay as applicable to JTO.
e) Some of the Officiating Local JTOs again filed writ petitions against Orders dated 20.11.20078 and 04.12.2007 before the Hon ble single Judge of the Hon ble Kerala High Court, which writ petitions were later transferred to the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal and the transferred petitions came to be decided in favour of the applicants by the Hon ble Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal vide decision dated 15.07.2009 in the case of M.V. Salilkumar & Ors. Vs. The Chairman & Managing Director & Ors. It is pertinent to submit here that the Hon ble Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal has simply followed the decision of the Hon ble Single Judge passed earlier which decision was set aside by the Hon ble Division Bench of the Hon ble Kerala High Court but did not independently apply its mind to the facts and law as is evident from para 10 of the judgment dated 15.07.2009.
f) Aggrieved by the judgment dated 15.07.2009 of the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal the Respondent Corporation filed Writ Petition Nos.8077/2010 and 7723/2010 before the Hon ble Kerala High Court which Writ Petitions have been admitted by the Hon ble High Court. However, no stay of the decision appealed against was granted by the Hon ble Kerala High Court.
g) Claiming parity and seeking extension of benefit granted vide Judgment dated 15.07.2009 by the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal, the Applicants herein, filed Original Application No.3213 of 2009 before the Hon ble Tribunal which Original Application No.3213 of 2009 was disposed of at the admission stage itself, vide Order dated 11.11.2009 by the Hon ble Tribunal directing the Respondent Corporation to examine whether the cases of the Applicants are covered by the aforesaid decision of the Ernakulam Bench and pass appropriate orders accordingly, and if it is found otherwise to pass a reasoned, and speaking order in the matter, under intimation to the Applicants.
h) Pursuant to the directions issued by the Hon ble Tribunal in its Order dated 11.11.2009 the Respondent Corporation examined the matter and passed reasoned and speaking order dated 05.01.2010 inter alia, on the ground that the officiating officers are not fulfilling the eligibility condition vis-`-vis the prescribed pre-appointed training as per Rule 5(2) of the JTO Recruitment Rules, 1996 they are entitled for pay fixation under FR-35 as per the provisions of GOI Order 3 below FR 35, DOPT OM No.1/10/89-Estt.(Pay-I) dated 22.10.1990; that the Respondent Corporation has not accepted the judgment of the Hon ble Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal and challenged the same by way of Writ Petitions before the Hon ble Kerala High Court and expressed its regret that it will not be possible for the Respondent to concede the request of the Applicants for fixing the pay of officiating JTOs without restriction under FR 35.
i) Aggrieved by the Order dated 05.01.2010 passed by the Respondent, the Applicants filed Original Application No.1282 of 2010 before the Hon ble Tribunal. The Respondent Corporation filed its counter to the original application claiming that the fixation of pay is to be done under Fundamental Rule 35 but not under Fundamental Rule 22(1)(a)(i) as claimed by the Applicants. It was specifically prayed in the counter that the matter may be kept in abeyance in view of the Respondent Corporation filing Writ Petitions before the Hon ble Kerala High Court which have been admitted and are pending for adjudication to which the Hon ble Tribunal did not agree but simply followed the decision dated 15.07.2009 of the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal without appreciating that the facts in the present O.A. are different from the facts of the O.A. decided by the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal.
As stated earlier the pay of the applicants before the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal was initially fixed on their promotion, applying FR 22(I)(a)(1) and their carry home pay was increased by Rs.1,500/- per month. On the mistake being realized the BSNL directed the refixation of the applicants before the Ernakulam bench of the Hon ble Tribunal pay under FR 35 by which maximum amount of Rs,1000/- was to be given above the basic pay and not in the scale of pay of the post of JTO. The amount wrongly paid was ordered to be recovered. Being aggrieved of this action the applicants before the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal had approached the Hon ble High Court of Kerala and wee granted interim stay.
As against this in the case of the Applicants before the Delhi Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal, since the applicants were not satisfying the requirements stipulated under the JTO Recruitment Rules of 1996, their pay was rightly fixed under FR 35. Thus, the applicants before the Delhi Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal are on a completely different pedestal with no similarity whatsoever with the applicants before the Ernakulam Bench of the Hon ble Tribunal.
It is only towards the end of para 2(i) at the bottom of page 7 that, for the first time, it is mentioned that as the applicants before the Principal Bench of the Tribunal did not satisfy the requirements stipulated under the JTO Recruitment Rules of 1996, their pay was rightly fixed under FR-35, and thus they would be on a completely different pedestal with no similarity whatsoever with the applicants before the Ernakulam Bench of the Tribunal. It is surprising to note that if it was the case of the review applicants that the facts leading to filing of the TA culminating into decision by the Ernakulam Bench are entirely different, why at every stage, be it in the OA or the review application, it has been time and again mentioned that the respondents (review applicants) had not accepted the judgment of the Ernakulam Bench and had, therefore, filed a writ against the same. It could well be said that in the case before the Ernakulam Bench and the writ that has been filed in the Kerala High Court the facts are entirely different and the said judgment would have no relevance whatsoever in deciding the controversy in issue. Such was never the case of the respondents. In the order impugned in the OA which came to be passed pursuant to directions given by us on 11.11.2009 in OA No.3213/2009 it has been clearly mentioned in clause (v) that BSNL has not accepted the judgment dated 15.07.2009 of Hon ble CAT, Ernakulam and has initiated necessary action for challenging the said judgment before the Hon ble High Court of Kerala . What really surprises us is that what was the need of saying so if the facts of the case in hand and the one subject matter of decision by the Ernakulam Bench were different. We are not making a mention of the reply filed on behalf of the respondents in the OA as the same would unnecessarily burden the judgment. We would rather prefer to annex with this judgment as Annexure-A copy of the reply filed on behalf of the respondents in the OA, which we order to be read as part of the judgment. There is not a single sentence mentioned therein that the facts of the case before the Ernakulam Bench and the one before us would be entirely different.
3. Why we have observed that of late a tendency is growing amongst the litigants to secure orders by hook or by crook is that this is not the only case where the respondents have sought and have been permitted to file review on mis-stating the facts before the Hon ble High Court. We have found from our experience that in some of the writs filed against our orders also a plea is raised that certain points were urged before the Tribunal, but it did not deal with the same. More often than not, on such statement, permission is sought and granted to move application for review. With a view to obviate such situation, we would hereafter specifically state in our orders that no points other than mentioned therein were raised by the learned counsel representing the parties.
4. The review application is dismissed.
M.A. No.3082/2010
This is an application seeking execution of the order dated 26.8.2010 passed in the OA. It was kept pending as against our order aforesaid, as permitted by the Hon ble High Court in the writ petition filed against the same, the respondents were allowed to make application for review, which has been dismissed by us today. That being so, we order the respondents to implement our order dated 26.8.2010 within a period of six weeks from today.
( Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda ) ( V. K. Bali )
Member (A) Chairman
/as/
Ur.N . KABEER DAS
2011/09/03
FR 22 (1) (a) (1) KERALA /CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PB NEW DELHI
SOME IMPORTANT POINTS IN FR 22(1) (a) (1) & COURT DIRECTIONS/ORDERS
The clarification for "F.R 17
(1) Subject to any exception specifically made in this rules and to the provision of sub rule (2) an officer shall begin to draw the pay and allowances attached to his tenure of a post with effect from the date when he assumes the duties of the post, and shall case to draw them as soon as he ceases to discharge those duties;
Provided that an officer who is absent from duty without any authority shall not be entitled to any pay and allowances during the period of such absence
(2) The date from which a person recruited overseas shall commence to draw pay on first appointment shall be determined by the general or special orders of the authority by whom he is appointed
F.R 22(1)(a)(1) reads as under
"The initial pay of a government servant who is appointed to a post on a time scale of pay is regulated as follows ;
(a)(1) Where a government servant holding a post , other than a tenure post , in a substantive or temporary or officiating capacity is promoted or appointed in a substantive , temporary or officiating capacity, as the case may be , subject to the fulfillment of the eligibility conditions as prescribed in the relevant Relevant Recruitment Rules, to another post carrying duties and responsibilities of greater importance than those attaching to the post held by him , his initial pay in the time scale of the higher post shall be fixed at the stage next above the notional pay arrived at by increasing his pay in respect of the lower post held by him regularly by an increment at the stage at which such pay has accrued or whichever is more ."
F.R. 35 reads as under
"The Central Government may fix the pay of officiating Government servant at an amount less than that admissible under these rules."
The applicants have further submitted that they fulfilled the eligibility conditions for appointment to the post of JTO in all respects and the said post carries duties and responsibilities of greater importance than the post of TTA .As such there pay cannot be fixed at an amount less than the pay admissible to
JTO under the rules. They have also relied upon the Exhibit P-23 judgement of the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in P.J.Nelson and others v/s The Chairman and M.D,BSNL, New Delhi,in W.p.(C) No.
35938/2005(S) where in the petitioners therein were similarly placed as the applicants.The Hon'ble High Court held as under
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH
NEW DELHI
Reng CA-3213/09,MA-1941/09
BSNL officers Association & ORS Applicant.Versus BSNL Respondents
The BSNL further issued an Offoce Order dated 13.5.2004 in terms of which the TTAs who had successfully completed JTO Phase-I training were to be promoted temporarily to officiate locally as JTOs with immediate effect with minimum benefit of Rs.1000/- as per FR-35
It is the contention of the counsel that since the applicants were holding substantive post of TTAs and officiating and discharging higher responsibility of the post of JTO , their pay should have been fixed according to the FR 22(1)(a)(i) as the applicants satisfied all the stipulations contained therein.She also submits that the issue involved in this OA has already been decided by the Ernakulam Bench of this Tribunal in TA Nos. 84 to 97 of 2008[ M.V.Salilakkumar & Ors. v . The Chairman & Managing Director & Ors .], decider on 15.07.2009. A copy of the Judgement has been enclosed at Annexure P6. She has further stated that the respondents have already implemented the said Judgement and that the Chief General Manager Telecom M.P. Circle Bhopal has also fixed pay scales of officiating JTOs under Fundamental Rules 22(1)(a)(i) read with Fundamental Rule 26.
In view of the aforesaid submissions , without going into the merits of the case, we are of the view that the interest of justice would be met, if the present OA is disposed of, at the admission stage itself , by directing the respondents to examine whether the cases of the applicants are covered by the aforesaid decision of the Ernakulam Bench(referred to above ), and to pass appropriate orders accordingly, and if it is found otherwise to pass a reasoned and speaking order in the matter, under intimation to the applicants. This may be done within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order . Order accordingly. No costs.
(Dr.Dharan Paul Sharma) (Shailendra Pandey)
Member (J) Member(A)
Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench
OA 1282/2010
New Delhi, this the 26th day of August,2010
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K.Bali,Chairman
Hon'ble Mr. L.K.Joshi,,Vice Chairman(A)
ORDER(ORAL)
Justice V.K.Bali,Chairman:
BSNL Officers Association (Regd) and Mr. N.Kabir Das have filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act,1985 seeking to quash order No.3-the matter of M.V.Salilakumar & Ors. V/s. The Chairman & Managing Director & Ors.(supra). However, we make it absolutely clear that the fate of the applicants herein would be dependent upon the writs filed by the respondents in Kerala
(L.K.Joshi) (V.K .Bali)
Vice Chairman(A) Chairman
The applicants are performing duties attached to the posts of JTOs having higher responsibilities.There is no dispute in this regard.Hence these T.As succeed.Consequently , we set aside the Annexure P25 and P26 orders dated 20.11.2007 and 4.122.2007 respectively.Respondents are directed not to recover the pay and allowances already paid to the applicants in the scale of pay of JTO .They are further directed to continue to pay to applicants pay and allowances due to them in the scale of pay of JTO as per Rule 22(1)(a)(1) of Fundamental Rules
With the aforesaid directions , these T.As are allowed .There shall be no orders as to costs
K.NOORJEHAN GEORGE PARACKEN
ADM INISTRATIVE MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
BSNL LETTER TO N.KABEER DAS AND BSNL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
No. 3-2/2009-Pers-IV Dated 5/1/2010
Sub-Implementation of Hon'ble CAT Ernakulum Bench judgement dated 15.07.2009 in TA No 84 to 97 of 2009 for 2173 JTO officiating Officials all over India -reg
Kindly refer to the order dated 11/1/2009 of the Hon'ble CAT Principal Bench in OA No.3213 of 2009 filed by BSNL Officers Association and you . In compliance with the order /directions of Hon'ble Tribunal, the request in the matter made in your said representation at Annexure A-8 of the OA has been examined in details and I am directed to inform you as follows
As officiating orders are not fulfilling the eligibility condition viz-a-viz the prescribed pre-appointment training as per rule 5(2) of JTO recruitment rules 1996,they are entitled for pay fixation under FR 35 as per the provisions of GOI order 3 below FR 35 , DOPT OM No. 1/10/89-Estt(pay-I) dated 22.10.1990. It may be added that provisions of FR 35 are not individual to any case, rather depending upon the nature of case the relevant provision of FR SR are attracted.
Moreover , as per the direction given by Hon'ble High Court of No. WA No. 2427/2006, a speaking order was issued vide BSNL letter No.3-Gen/2/2006-Pers.IV dated 20.11.2007 clarifying that as the officiating officers do not fulfill the eligibility condition viz-a-viz the prescribed pre-appointment training as provided under rule 5(2) of JTO Recruitment Rule 1996,their pay has been restricted under FR 35 as per the provisions of GOI order 3 below under FR 35 , DOPT OM No. 1/10/89-estt(pay I) dated 22.01.1990.But , a few officiating JTO's of Kerala circle approached the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala by filing some Writ petitions challenging inter-alia the speaking order dated 20/11/2007 mentioned above.The cases were subsequently transferred to CAT Ernakulam Bench which vide its judgment dated 15/07/2009 has quashed the speaking order
BSNL has not accepted the judgement dated 15/07/2009 of Hon'ble CAT ,Ernakulam and has initiated necessary action for challenging the said judgement before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.In view of the foregoing , it is to regret , that it will not be possible for BSNL at this stage , to conceive your request for fixing the pay of officiating JTO's without restriction under FR 35
This issues with the approval of competent authority .
(P.M VERMA)
BSNL LETTER challenged in Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi through MA 3082/2010
BSNL submitted RA.125/2011
FOR DIRECTION (i.e MA'S/RA'S)
In the final hearing on 30/08/2011 court no.1 serial no. 19 RA.125/2011 dismissed and judgement passed for implementation of FR 22(1)(a)(1) .
Waiting for judgement details
NEW DELHI
Reng CA-3213/09,MA-1941/09
BSNL officers Association & ORS Applicant.Versus BSNL Respondents
The BSNL further issued an Offoce Order dated 13.5.2004 in terms of which the TTAs who had successfully completed JTO Phase-I training were to be promoted temporarily to officiate locally as JTOs with immediate effect with minimum benefit of Rs.1000/- as per FR-35
It is the contention of the counsel that since the applicants were holding substantive post of TTAs and officiating and discharging higher responsibility of the post of JTO , their pay should have been fixed according to the FR 22(1)(a)(i) as the applicants satisfied all the stipulations contained therein.She also submits that the issue involved in this OA has already been decided by the Ernakulam Bench of this Tribunal in TA Nos. 84 to 97 of 2008[ M.V.Salilakkumar & Ors. v . The Chairman & Managing Director & Ors .], decider on 15.07.2009. A copy of the Judgement has been enclosed at Annexure P6. She has further stated that the respondents have already implemented the said Judgement and that the Chief General Manager Telecom M.P. Circle Bhopal has also fixed pay scales of officiating JTOs under Fundamental Rules 22(1)(a)(i) read with Fundamental Rule 26.
In view of the aforesaid submissions , without going into the merits of the case, we are of the view that the interest of justice would be met, if the present OA is disposed of, at the admission stage itself , by directing the respondents to examine whether the cases of the applicants are covered by the aforesaid decision of the Ernakulam Bench(referred to above ), and to pass appropriate orders accordingly, and if it is found otherwise to pass a reasoned and speaking order in the matter, under intimation to the applicants. This may be done within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order . Order accordingly. No costs.
(Dr.Dharan Paul Sharma) (Shailendra Pandey)
Member (J) Member(A)
Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench
OA 1282/2010
New Delhi, this the 26th day of August,2010
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K.Bali,Chairman
Hon'ble Mr. L.K.Joshi,,Vice Chairman(A)
ORDER(ORAL)
Justice V.K.Bali,Chairman:
BSNL Officers Association (Regd) and Mr. N.Kabir Das have filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act,1985 seeking to quash order No.3-the matter of M.V.Salilakumar & Ors. V/s. The Chairman & Managing Director & Ors.(supra). However, we make it absolutely clear that the fate of the applicants herein would be dependent upon the writs filed by the respondents in Kerala
(L.K.Joshi) (V.K .Bali)
Vice Chairman(A) Chairman
The applicants are performing duties attached to the posts of JTOs having higher responsibilities.There is no dispute in this regard.Hence these T.As succeed.Consequently , we set aside the Annexure P25 and P26 orders dated 20.11.2007 and 4.122.2007 respectively.Respondents are directed not to recover the pay and allowances already paid to the applicants in the scale of pay of JTO .They are further directed to continue to pay to applicants pay and allowances due to them in the scale of pay of JTO as per Rule 22(1)(a)(1) of Fundamental Rules
With the aforesaid directions , these T.As are allowed .There shall be no orders as to costs
K.NOORJEHAN GEORGE PARACKEN
ADM INISTRATIVE MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
BSNL LETTER TO N.KABEER DAS AND BSNL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
No. 3-2/2009-Pers-IV Dated 5/1/2010
Sub-Implementation of Hon'ble CAT Ernakulum Bench judgement dated 15.07.2009 in TA No 84 to 97 of 2009 for 2173 JTO officiating Officials all over India -reg
Kindly refer to the order dated 11/1/2009 of the Hon'ble CAT Principal Bench in OA No.3213 of 2009 filed by BSNL Officers Association and you . In compliance with the order /directions of Hon'ble Tribunal, the request in the matter made in your said representation at Annexure A-8 of the OA has been examined in details and I am directed to inform you as follows
As officiating orders are not fulfilling the eligibility condition viz-a-viz the prescribed pre-appointment training as per rule 5(2) of JTO recruitment rules 1996,they are entitled for pay fixation under FR 35 as per the provisions of GOI order 3 below FR 35 , DOPT OM No. 1/10/89-Estt(pay-I) dated 22.10.1990. It may be added that provisions of FR 35 are not individual to any case, rather depending upon the nature of case the relevant provision of FR SR are attracted.
Moreover , as per the direction given by Hon'ble High Court of No. WA No. 2427/2006, a speaking order was issued vide BSNL letter No.3-Gen/2/2006-Pers.IV dated 20.11.2007 clarifying that as the officiating officers do not fulfill the eligibility condition viz-a-viz the prescribed pre-appointment training as provided under rule 5(2) of JTO Recruitment Rule 1996,their pay has been restricted under FR 35 as per the provisions of GOI order 3 below under FR 35 , DOPT OM No. 1/10/89-estt(pay I) dated 22.01.1990.But , a few officiating JTO's of Kerala circle approached the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala by filing some Writ petitions challenging inter-alia the speaking order dated 20/11/2007 mentioned above.The cases were subsequently transferred to CAT Ernakulam Bench which vide its judgment dated 15/07/2009 has quashed the speaking order
BSNL has not accepted the judgement dated 15/07/2009 of Hon'ble CAT ,Ernakulam and has initiated necessary action for challenging the said judgement before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala.In view of the foregoing , it is to regret , that it will not be possible for BSNL at this stage , to conceive your request for fixing the pay of officiating JTO's without restriction under FR 35
This issues with the approval of competent authority .
(P.M VERMA)
BSNL LETTER challenged in Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi through MA 3082/2010
BSNL submitted RA.125/2011
FOR DIRECTION (i.e MA'S/RA'S)
In the final hearing on 30/08/2011 court no.1 serial no. 19 RA.125/2011 dismissed and judgement passed for implementation of FR 22(1)(a)(1) .
Waiting for judgement details
BSNL EU ALL INDIA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING
The BSNL EU all India executive meeting is being held on 03/09/2011 at Warangal Ricemills garden Andhrapradesh,
Sri .V.AN.Namboodri All India President secretary Staff side leader and National Council Member
Sri.P.Abhimanyu , General Secretary, BSNL EU and Sri P,Asok Babu , Deputy General Secretary are attending the meeting . Hope that the meeting is a grand success.
On Sept 4th 2011 (i.e) sunday - A big felicitation function of Sri J. Sampath Rao(C/S) and National Council Member who was retired on 31st august 2011. The JTO (O) BSNL INDIA AP Circle Delegation is going to Warangal to greet his retirement life .
The delegation is also meeting all the National Council Members to discuss the latest position of FR(22)(1)(a)(1)
Sri .V.AN.Namboodri All India President secretary Staff side leader and National Council Member
Sri.P.Abhimanyu , General Secretary, BSNL EU and Sri P,Asok Babu , Deputy General Secretary are attending the meeting . Hope that the meeting is a grand success.
On Sept 4th 2011 (i.e) sunday - A big felicitation function of Sri J. Sampath Rao(C/S) and National Council Member who was retired on 31st august 2011. The JTO (O) BSNL INDIA AP Circle Delegation is going to Warangal to greet his retirement life .
The delegation is also meeting all the National Council Members to discuss the latest position of FR(22)(1)(a)(1)
2011/08/30
FR22(1)A 1 CASE UPDATE
THE PRICIPAL CAT TODAY DIRECTED BSNL TO IMPLEMENT FR22(1)A1 SCALE TO ALL OFFICIATING JTOs .
TO DAY THE PRICIPAL CAT WHILE HEARING THE CASE HAS DIRECTED BSNL TO IMPLEMENT FR22(1)A1 SCALE TO ALL OFFICIATING JTOs ATPAR WITH KERALA JUDGEMENT.CAT HAS DIRECTED BSNL TO IMPLEMENT THE SAME WHILE HEARING OUR CASES WITH SL NOs :1.RA125/2011,2.OA1282/2010 AND 3.MA308/2010 KABEERDAS
2011/08/20
REGARDING COCP:1431/2008
YESTERDAY THE COCP:1431/2008 WAS LISTED FOR HEARING.6 SENIOR OFFICERS AND ADVOCATE ATTENDED THE CHANDIGARH COURT AND UNDER PECULAR CIRCUMASTANCES THE CASE WAS ASKED FOR POSTPONEMENT BY DEPT.THE CASE WAS POSTED FOR NEXT HEARING TO NOVEMBER-23 OF 2011.
THIS ASSOCIATION IS INFIRM VIEW THAT THERE WILL BE NO JTO LICE EXAM UNTIL THE CHANDIGARH COURT CASE IS FINALISED AND WE ARE WELL PREPARED TO SEE THAT THERE WILL BE NO EXAM UNTIL THIS CASE IS CLEARED.....KABEERDAS
THIS ASSOCIATION IS INFIRM VIEW THAT THERE WILL BE NO JTO LICE EXAM UNTIL THE CHANDIGARH COURT CASE IS FINALISED AND WE ARE WELL PREPARED TO SEE THAT THERE WILL BE NO EXAM UNTIL THIS CASE IS CLEARED.....KABEERDAS
2011/08/18
NEWS FROM VHANDIGARH
YESTERDAY WE MET SENIOR OFFICERS OF CORPORATE OFFICE ON OUR ISSUES.REGARDING RAJASTAN CGMT OFFICE NOT ISSUEING OFFICIATING ORDERS TO JTOs RECENTLY ,I PESONNALLY SPOKE TO GM RAJASTAN CIRCLE AND REQUESTED TO DO THE NEEDFULL.
SRI.PRAHLADRAI,GS AIBSNLEA ALSO WRITTEN LETTER TO CMD AND CGMT RAJASTAN ON THE SAME ISSUE.WE DISCUSSED OUR ISSUES WITH HIM.
ON FR22(1)A1 ISSUE WE MET SMT.RANICHABRA ,OUR LAYWER AND SHE IS IN FULL CONFIDENCE THAT THE CASE WILL BE SETTLED ON 30TH OF AUGUST.
REGARDING CHANDIGARH COCP,WE ARE GOING TO CHANDIGARH TODAY AND AS PER INFORMATION RECEIVED Mr.PRAMODKOHLI (JUDGE)IS GOING TO HEAR THE CASE TOMMORROW,WE ARE GOING TO PRESENT IN THE COURT TOMMORROW.MR.RAMAKRISHNA,RADHARAMAN,RAJENDERREDDYAND MY SELF WILL PRESENT THERE TOMMORROW.....KABEERDAS
NEWS FROM DELHI
YESTERDAY WE MET SENIOR OFFICERS OF CORPORATE OFFICE ON OUR ISSUES.REGARDING RAJASTAN CGMT OFFICE NOT ISSUEING OFFICIATING ORDERS TO JTOs RECENTLY ,I PESONNALLY SPOKE TO GM RAJASTAN CIRCLE AND REQUESTED TO DO THE NEEDFULL.
SRI.PRAHLADRAI,GS AIBSNLEA ALSO WRITTEN LETTER TO CMD AND CGMT RAJASTAN ON THE SAME ISSUE.WE DISCUSSED OUR ISSUES WITH HIM.
ON FR22(1)A1 ISSUE WE MET SMT.RANICHABRA ,OUR LAYWER AND SHE IS IN FULL CONFIDENCE THAT THE CASE WILL BE SETTLED ON 30TH OF AUGUST.
REGARDING CHANDIGARH COCP,WE ARE GOING TO CHANDIGARH TODAY AND AS PER INFORMATION RECEIVED THE SAME JUDGE WE HAS DELIVERED THE ORIGINAL JUDMENT IS GOING TO HEAR THE CASE TOMMORROW,WE ARE SEEING THAT THERE IS A 25% POSSIBILITY OF GETTING THE JUDGEMENT INFAVOUR OF THE PETETIONERS.SO ALL THE JTOs REGULARED UNDER SUPERNUMERY POSTs AND ALSO THE LEFTOUT OJTs ,PLEASE BE PREPARED TO CHALLANGE THE JUDGEMENT IF IT GOES AGAINST US.....KABEERDAS
SRI.PRAHLADRAI,GS AIBSNLEA ALSO WRITTEN LETTER TO CMD AND CGMT RAJASTAN ON THE SAME ISSUE.WE DISCUSSED OUR ISSUES WITH HIM.
ON FR22(1)A1 ISSUE WE MET SMT.RANICHABRA ,OUR LAYWER AND SHE IS IN FULL CONFIDENCE THAT THE CASE WILL BE SETTLED ON 30TH OF AUGUST.
REGARDING CHANDIGARH COCP,WE ARE GOING TO CHANDIGARH TODAY AND AS PER INFORMATION RECEIVED THE SAME JUDGE WE HAS DELIVERED THE ORIGINAL JUDMENT IS GOING TO HEAR THE CASE TOMMORROW,WE ARE SEEING THAT THERE IS A 25% POSSIBILITY OF GETTING THE JUDGEMENT INFAVOUR OF THE PETETIONERS.SO ALL THE JTOs REGULARED UNDER SUPERNUMERY POSTs AND ALSO THE LEFTOUT OJTs ,PLEASE BE PREPARED TO CHALLANGE THE JUDGEMENT IF IT GOES AGAINST US.....KABEERDAS
2011/07/12
CHANDIGARH COURT CASE COCO1431/2008 LISTED ON 19th AUG 2011
The Chandigarh court case COCP 1431/2008 posted for hearing on friday 19th Auguest 2011....
Conducting of JTO LICE Asper corporate office letter Personnel -1v Section .
Dy. No. 3-3/2010/Pers-1v Dated: 7th july,2011
BSNL filed Review Petition in the Hon'ble CAT Ernakulam , matter is under sub-judice hence not possible to conduct the JTO LICE present, This was the reply given to General Secretary BSNL Employees Union ........
Conducting of JTO LICE Asper corporate office letter Personnel -1v Section .
Dy. No. 3-3/2010/Pers-1v Dated: 7th july,2011
BSNL filed Review Petition in the Hon'ble CAT Ernakulam , matter is under sub-judice hence not possible to conduct the JTO LICE present, This was the reply given to General Secretary BSNL Employees Union ........
2011/07/11
COCP 1431/2008 CHANDIGARH COURT CASE
Today's COCP 1431/2008 Chandigarh court case Srl no 202 court no 12 adjourned due to not attended Sr Advocate general sri ASHVINDER SINGH , He is attending another case in Supreme court. date will be intimated later............
LDCE exame Notification may delay another 3 months due to clarification of 10 years to 7 years service condition whether it Retrospective or Prospective ..........
FR 22(1)(A)(1) CASE NEW DELHI OA NO 1282/2010. RA NO 125/2011 expecting final hearing on 15th julu 2011. adv smt RANICHHABBRA..........
LDCE exame Notification may delay another 3 months due to clarification of 10 years to 7 years service condition whether it Retrospective or Prospective ..........
FR 22(1)(A)(1) CASE NEW DELHI OA NO 1282/2010. RA NO 125/2011 expecting final hearing on 15th julu 2011. adv smt RANICHHABBRA..........
2011/07/04
ANDHRAPRADESH SSA COORDINATORS MEETING/ NEPP
The Andhra Pradesh SSA coordinators meeting was held on 03/07/2011 at VIJAYWADA ,Andhra furniture's Association Building, 3rd floor ,from 11.00 hrs to 17.00 hrs.under the chairmen ship of sri.KVRR.PRASAD Vijaywada Krishna ssa Cord,the following coordinators attended B.VENUGOPAL RAO,J.S .ANWAR BASHA .P.R.K.MOHAN RAO.S.K MAHABOOB VALI. P.NIRANJAN KUMAR. G.LAKSHMANA RAO. B BRAHMANANDA REDDY. P . RAMI REDDY . K.B.G. THILAK. U.J.L.RAVI. CH. MURALI KRISHNA. D.GOPALA RAO. P.PRABHAKAR BABU. S.SRINIVASA RAO. N . RAVINDRA BABU. .L R.SHEAKER. M. HANUMA REDDY. M SAMBASIVA REDDY. J. APPI REDDY. M.B.V.RAMANJANEYULU. T.RAMMOHAN. K. CHITTIBABU . M. DURGAAPPARAO. R SANKARLINGAM. K.R.RAJENDER RAJU . K.NARSIMHA REDDY. U.KANAKARAJU. K.ARJUN RAO . P.RAVIKUMAR. M.SAMBAIAH. J. RADHARAMAN .R.H.V.PRASAD. and smt KASTHAYINI ....and have discussed 3 important issues mainly
1.PERSONAL UP GRADATION/ SUPERNUMERARY
2.FR 22(1) (A)(1) / COURT CASES/
3.NEPP
All the ssa coordinators discussed and gave some suggestions .Finally central coordinator explained about the latest position of court cases,OTMP up gradation and NEPP.
ARISE AWAKE AND STOP NOT TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED...... SWAMI VIVEKANANDA......
Our issues were discussed in the National Council Meeting held on 24/06/2011 . Three items were clubbed together and discussed . Implementation of Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench Judgement OA NO 1282/2010.RA 125/2011 granting of JTO pay scale and fixation under FR 22 (1) (a) (1) for officiating JTO's. Restriction of officiating pay under FR 35 implementation of JAO's/JTO's. Appointment of TTA's officiating as JTO's as regular JTO. After lengthy discussion the chairman accepted the genuiness of the demand and assured that the demand would be sympathetically examined. Our point was discussed in the council point no 4 which is 30th point in the agenda , Our Association is thankful to sri P.ASOKBABU ,sri.P.ABHIMANYU, sri.VAN.NAMBOODRI, sri. J.SAMPATH RAO , sri .R.VENKATRANAN. sri V.SUBBURAMAN sri.SURESH KUMAR .sri.B S .RAGHUWANSHI.sri VIJENDER SING sriAR .SAFI.sri R.RAVEENDRAN sri. B.R.JAKHATIA sri.R.K.KOHLI and sri P.ANDIAPPAN. sri Sampath rao asked GM estb that they were not concenrating on the issue of officiating jto's.....
Revision of pay scale sl no 9. grade NE 9 7100-200-10100 / 13600-25420.....
Non-Executive Promotion Policy (NEPP) for TTA'S Points raised--Clarification issued. ltr No 13-2/2010-te dated 20-08-2010/
F. No 27-7/2008- TE dated 06-09-2010
No .13-2/2010-te dated 06/01/2011
No 13. Whether the JTO/Officiating promotion is also to be taken as upgradationunder NEPP?
the JTO/JAO/Astt. Manager/PA are executive posts and are not covered under NEPP. Hence, the substantive post hold by the official will be consider under NEPP and in such cases, the concerned employees will be regulated as per the clarification given vide point nos 8& 9 of this office letter of even no dated 20/08/2010......
BSNL EMPLOYEES UNION .G/S sri P.Abhimanyu gave the letter to sri A.K.Garg Director (HR) BSNL LTR NO. BSNLEU/124(UF) on 28/06/2011....
Upgradation of TTA pay scale on 1-10-2000 as per the earlier decision of the DoT. This pay scale revision of the TTA cadre does not fall with in the category of "time bound up gradation of pay scale". Hence this pay scale revision of TTA cadre w.e.f.01.10.2010, should not be treated as a part of the NEPP. The promotion policy agreement as well as the order issued on 23-03-2010 provide for counting OTBP/BCR/Grade- 4 / ACP etc as first up gradition under NEPP if it is given "after" 1-10-2000 AND NOT "ON 1-10-2000"(see para 8 of the promotion policy agreement and para 6.4 of the NEPP order dated 23-3-2010 ).
Therefore this clarification for counting TTA pay scale up gradation on 1-10-2000 as first NEPP is violation of the Agreem,ent on NEPP and also violation of the order issued on it on 23-3-2010. Hence this up gradation as well as any up gradation on 1-10-2000 should not be counted as first up gradation under NEPP.
1.PERSONAL UP GRADATION/ SUPERNUMERARY
2.FR 22(1) (A)(1) / COURT CASES/
3.NEPP
All the ssa coordinators discussed and gave some suggestions .Finally central coordinator explained about the latest position of court cases,OTMP up gradation and NEPP.
ARISE AWAKE AND STOP NOT TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED...... SWAMI VIVEKANANDA......
Our issues were discussed in the National Council Meeting held on 24/06/2011 . Three items were clubbed together and discussed . Implementation of Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench Judgement OA NO 1282/2010.RA 125/2011 granting of JTO pay scale and fixation under FR 22 (1) (a) (1) for officiating JTO's. Restriction of officiating pay under FR 35 implementation of JAO's/JTO's. Appointment of TTA's officiating as JTO's as regular JTO. After lengthy discussion the chairman accepted the genuiness of the demand and assured that the demand would be sympathetically examined. Our point was discussed in the council point no 4 which is 30th point in the agenda , Our Association is thankful to sri P.ASOKBABU ,sri.P.ABHIMANYU, sri.VAN.NAMBOODRI, sri. J.SAMPATH RAO , sri .R.VENKATRANAN. sri V.SUBBURAMAN sri.SURESH KUMAR .sri.B S .RAGHUWANSHI.sri VIJENDER SING sriAR .SAFI.sri R.RAVEENDRAN sri. B.R.JAKHATIA sri.R.K.KOHLI and sri P.ANDIAPPAN. sri Sampath rao asked GM estb that they were not concenrating on the issue of officiating jto's.....
Revision of pay scale sl no 9. grade NE 9 7100-200-10100 / 13600-25420.....
Non-Executive Promotion Policy (NEPP) for TTA'S Points raised--Clarification issued. ltr No 13-2/2010-te dated 20-08-2010/
F. No 27-7/2008- TE dated 06-09-2010
No .13-2/2010-te dated 06/01/2011
No 13. Whether the JTO/Officiating promotion is also to be taken as upgradationunder NEPP?
the JTO/JAO/Astt. Manager/PA are executive posts and are not covered under NEPP. Hence, the substantive post hold by the official will be consider under NEPP and in such cases, the concerned employees will be regulated as per the clarification given vide point nos 8& 9 of this office letter of even no dated 20/08/2010......
BSNL EMPLOYEES UNION .G/S sri P.Abhimanyu gave the letter to sri A.K.Garg Director (HR) BSNL LTR NO. BSNLEU/124(UF) on 28/06/2011....
Upgradation of TTA pay scale on 1-10-2000 as per the earlier decision of the DoT. This pay scale revision of the TTA cadre does not fall with in the category of "time bound up gradation of pay scale". Hence this pay scale revision of TTA cadre w.e.f.01.10.2010, should not be treated as a part of the NEPP. The promotion policy agreement as well as the order issued on 23-03-2010 provide for counting OTBP/BCR/Grade- 4 / ACP etc as first up gradition under NEPP if it is given "after" 1-10-2000 AND NOT "ON 1-10-2000"(see para 8 of the promotion policy agreement and para 6.4 of the NEPP order dated 23-3-2010 ).
Therefore this clarification for counting TTA pay scale up gradation on 1-10-2000 as first NEPP is violation of the Agreem,ent on NEPP and also violation of the order issued on it on 23-3-2010. Hence this up gradation as well as any up gradation on 1-10-2000 should not be counted as first up gradation under NEPP.
2011/06/25
25th NATIONAL COUNCIL INFORMATION
The Pre National Council meeting held on 23-06-2011 at Eastern Court Staff Side National Council Office. Our Central Co-ordinator attended the Meeting and gave opinion of all JTO (O) officers for Personal Upgradation/FR22(1)A(1). All the NC members unanimesly accepted for our legitimate long pending issue of Personal Upgradation from TTAs to JTO.
On 24-06-2011 the National Council Meeting was held at Bharat Sanchar Bhavan Corporate Office New Delhi. All the 32 points in the Agenda were discussed including Our point. The Management principally agreed for Personal Upgradation depends on the outcome of 11th July COCP 1431/2008 Chandighad case. We hope very shortly some favourable Orders may issued. Our Association Thanks to all National Council Members mainly Sri V.A.N Namboodri, Sri. P.Abhimanyu, Sri P.Ashok Babu, Sri Sampath Rao, Sri R.Venkatraman, Sri Subburan, Sri Suresh Kumar and Sri Kohli.
Our State Co-ordinators Sri R.Adam TN, Sri Dokhale MP, Sri Kanaka Raju AP,Sri Anwar Bhasha AP , Sri K.Prasad AP, Sri P.S.Chanda RJS and Sri Hemant Arora MP met our Advocate Smt Rani Chhabbra regarding FR22(1)A(1) and all the National Council Members personally discussed about our issue i.e. PERSONAL UPGRADATION for leftout officials all over the country.
2011/06/24
NEWS FROM DELHI
YESTERDAY ,STAFF SIDE MEETING OF NATIONAL COUNCIL MEMBERS WAS HELD AT DELHI AND DISCUSSED ABOUT THE ITEMS WHICH ARE TO BE DISCUSSED IN THE NATIONAL COUNCIL.THE MAIN ITEMS WERE NE-12 SCALE AND REGULARISATION OF OJTOs .EVERY BODY INSISTED FOR OUR REGULARISATION.I PERSONNALLY ATTENDED THE MEETING WHICH WAS HELD FROM 11AM TO 2PM.
IN THE EVENING WE DISCUSSED OUR ISSUES WITH OTHER LEADERS LIKE SRI.VAN.NAMBOODRI,ABHIMANYU,ASHOKBABU,SURESH KUMAR OF BSNLMS,TEPU LEADERS AND OTHERS AND REQUESTED FOR FULL SUPPORT FOR OUR ISSUE.....KABEERDAS
IN THE EVENING WE DISCUSSED OUR ISSUES WITH OTHER LEADERS LIKE SRI.VAN.NAMBOODRI,ABHIMANYU,ASHOKBABU,SURESH KUMAR OF BSNLMS,TEPU LEADERS AND OTHERS AND REQUESTED FOR FULL SUPPORT FOR OUR ISSUE.....KABEERDAS
2011/06/07
25th NATIONAL COUNCIL MEETING ITEM NO 30
Tth BSNL EU submitted 32 items for discussion in the 25th national council meeting which wiil be held on 24th june 2011,our item no 30 included in details ..
Appointment of TTAs officiating as JTOs as regularl JTO.....
The TTAas qualified as JTOs in 35% quota in the exam held against the vacancies existing as on 31-8-1999 were sent for JTO Phase 1 training and given promotion as JTOon officiating basis and thereafter3500 of them were apponted as JTO on regular basis by diverting outside quota posts.Subsequently after the judgment of Chandigarh High Court againstsuch divesion of out side quota post, these 3500 already promoted officials were countinued as JTO by creating supernumerary posts for them and in this order for creating supernumarary posts it was clearly stated by BSNL CO that it was also ensured that the promotional aspects of those officials who are eligible for consideration under RRs of JTOs, 2011 are not diminished in any manner and these supernumerary post would be kept as a separate group and would not be a part of regular sanctiond strength of JTOs and these supernumerary posts would stand abolished as and when the incumbents vacate the sane due to promotion,superannuation ect. (BSNL CO NO. 3-9/2007-pers-1V dt 11-11-2008.).
Whil this was so, another 1800 officials similarly placed are countinuing still as officiating JTO since the procession of diversion of out side quota posts was stopped for them after Chandigarh High Court's judgment. The of their promotion as JTO on regular basis requires sympathetic consideration on the following grounds.
a) Asper law. they cannot be treated diffirently while the 3500 similarly placed officials were already promoted as JTO on regular basis.
b) They have countributed for the BSNL's development in their capacity as officiating JTO for several years and after such a long time, it will be fair and justified to appoin them as JTO on regular basis.
c) No additional financial burden is involved regarding the expenditure on their salaries since they are being given 3% increment as officiating JTO and the same 3% increment will be given even on their promotion as JTO on regulas basis.
To facilitate their promotion as JTI on regular basis without any complication, the fallowing is suggested for consideration:
a) All these officials can be upgraded as JTO on personal upgradation basis as was done by DOT in case promotion SI,LI as TM and RSA/PI to JTO. Their TTApost can be upgraded as JTO post on personal upgradation basis and after their retirement, the post can be treated as TTA post .
b) Since the 3500 officials already upgraded as JTO by creation of supernumerary post which ard kept as a separate group without being a part of the regular sanctioned strength of JTOs, the posts upgraded for these officials on personal upgradation basis can be kept as a separate group without becoming a part of the regular sanctioned strength of JTOs.
c) This arrangement will not diminish the promotional aspects of those officials who are eligible for consideration under RRs of JTOs, 2001 are not diminished in any manner .
It is there fore requested to cause necessary orders for promoting these officials as JTOs on regular basis.
Appointment of TTAs officiating as JTOs as regularl JTO.....
The TTAas qualified as JTOs in 35% quota in the exam held against the vacancies existing as on 31-8-1999 were sent for JTO Phase 1 training and given promotion as JTOon officiating basis and thereafter3500 of them were apponted as JTO on regular basis by diverting outside quota posts.Subsequently after the judgment of Chandigarh High Court againstsuch divesion of out side quota post, these 3500 already promoted officials were countinued as JTO by creating supernumerary posts for them and in this order for creating supernumarary posts it was clearly stated by BSNL CO that it was also ensured that the promotional aspects of those officials who are eligible for consideration under RRs of JTOs, 2011 are not diminished in any manner and these supernumerary post would be kept as a separate group and would not be a part of regular sanctiond strength of JTOs and these supernumerary posts would stand abolished as and when the incumbents vacate the sane due to promotion,superannuation ect. (BSNL CO NO. 3-9/2007-pers-1V dt 11-11-2008.).
Whil this was so, another 1800 officials similarly placed are countinuing still as officiating JTO since the procession of diversion of out side quota posts was stopped for them after Chandigarh High Court's judgment. The of their promotion as JTO on regular basis requires sympathetic consideration on the following grounds.
a) Asper law. they cannot be treated diffirently while the 3500 similarly placed officials were already promoted as JTO on regular basis.
b) They have countributed for the BSNL's development in their capacity as officiating JTO for several years and after such a long time, it will be fair and justified to appoin them as JTO on regular basis.
c) No additional financial burden is involved regarding the expenditure on their salaries since they are being given 3% increment as officiating JTO and the same 3% increment will be given even on their promotion as JTO on regulas basis.
To facilitate their promotion as JTI on regular basis without any complication, the fallowing is suggested for consideration:
a) All these officials can be upgraded as JTO on personal upgradation basis as was done by DOT in case promotion SI,LI as TM and RSA/PI to JTO. Their TTApost can be upgraded as JTO post on personal upgradation basis and after their retirement, the post can be treated as TTA post .
b) Since the 3500 officials already upgraded as JTO by creation of supernumerary post which ard kept as a separate group without being a part of the regular sanctioned strength of JTOs, the posts upgraded for these officials on personal upgradation basis can be kept as a separate group without becoming a part of the regular sanctioned strength of JTOs.
c) This arrangement will not diminish the promotional aspects of those officials who are eligible for consideration under RRs of JTOs, 2001 are not diminished in any manner .
It is there fore requested to cause necessary orders for promoting these officials as JTOs on regular basis.
2011/06/04
ONETIME UPGRADITION/SUPERNUMERIC POSTS-AND LDCE EXAM
The Onetime upgradation/Supernumerary post proposal was given by BSNL EU in 25th National Council Meeting which will be held on 24th june 2011,for all Officiating JTOs.
SRI.PRAHALAD RAI G/S AIBSNLEA countiniously pursuing our OTMU/SUP with the management.He also met GM Est sri DP.De on the above issue, he replied that Management will take some decesion after Chandigarh case of contempt (COCP 1431/2008) disposal.
Our Association conveys thanks to Sri.Prahalad rai who was taking maximum pain for left out jtos who are officiating all ove the country(Official figures are 2173 but actual figure is only 1800 in 12 circles and 2 telecom districts,1.ANDHRA PRADESH 2.KARNATAKA 3.TAMILNADU 4.KERALA 5.MAHARASHTRA 6.MP& CHETTISGARH 7.GUJARATH 8.WEST BENGAL 9. RAJASTHAN 10.UP East 11.HARYANA and12 J&K .The 2 Telecom districts are 1.KOLKATTA TELECOM DISTRICT and 2.CHENNAI TELECOM DISTRICT.
FR 22 (1)A(1) NEW DELHI High court Case was heard on 03-06-2911,BSNL Advocate not turned up, The case again posted on 7th july 2011....
COCP 1431/2008 case will be heard on 11th july 2011.....
National Council Meeting on 24th june 2011(25th NCM).....
BSNL asked all Circles JTO's vcancies from 2000 on wards year wise community wise ie OC/SC/ST
for LDCE exam 15%and 35%......Kabeerdas
SRI.PRAHALAD RAI G/S AIBSNLEA countiniously pursuing our OTMU/SUP with the management.He also met GM Est sri DP.De on the above issue, he replied that Management will take some decesion after Chandigarh case of contempt (COCP 1431/2008) disposal.
Our Association conveys thanks to Sri.Prahalad rai who was taking maximum pain for left out jtos who are officiating all ove the country(Official figures are 2173 but actual figure is only 1800 in 12 circles and 2 telecom districts,1.ANDHRA PRADESH 2.KARNATAKA 3.TAMILNADU 4.KERALA 5.MAHARASHTRA 6.MP& CHETTISGARH 7.GUJARATH 8.WEST BENGAL 9. RAJASTHAN 10.UP East 11.HARYANA and12 J&K .The 2 Telecom districts are 1.KOLKATTA TELECOM DISTRICT and 2.CHENNAI TELECOM DISTRICT.
FR 22 (1)A(1) NEW DELHI High court Case was heard on 03-06-2911,BSNL Advocate not turned up, The case again posted on 7th july 2011....
COCP 1431/2008 case will be heard on 11th july 2011.....
National Council Meeting on 24th june 2011(25th NCM).....
BSNL asked all Circles JTO's vcancies from 2000 on wards year wise community wise ie OC/SC/ST
for LDCE exam 15%and 35%......Kabeerdas
2011/05/30
2011/05/28
23/06/2011 PRE NATIONAL COUNCIL MEETING
The pre national council meeting is on 23/06/2011 at western court new delhi. All the NC members are discussing the agenda items, particularly our issue which is long pending and legitimate demand of Regularisation /Supernumerary JTO posts. Since 6 years we are struggling a lot for this . We hope this may solve our case very shortly and for that we have to sacrifice some thing for our achievement . We will intimate all the latest updates and we are in regular contact with NC members and pursuing our case seriously .11th july COCP may dispose, 30th may FR 22 (1)A(1)case may favour us or we may get some direction from the court till the outcome of the final judgement.
Don't believe any rumours .. contact with state coordinators.SSA coordinators for more info .....
Don't believe any rumours .. contact with state coordinators.SSA coordinators for more info .....
2011/05/27
BEST CIRCLE AWARD TO KARNATAKA
BEST CIRCLE Awards were given on 26/05/2011 at Bharath Sanchar Bhavan NEW DELHI by hon'ble MOC & IT shri KAPILSIBHAL,
Large circle Awardto KARNATAKA....
Midium circle Award to CHENNAI .....
Small circle Award to ORISSA and HIMACHAL PRADESH......
THESE CIRCLES ARE GENERATED MORE REVENUE IN THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-11...
THE JTO(O)ASSOCIATION BSNL INDIA HEARTILY CONGRATULATIONS TO BSNL FAMILY OF ALL THESE CIRCLES.////////
BSNL EU given a letter to the bsnl management TSM regularised in BSNL be treated as DOT recruitees for the purpose of granting promotion under NEPP.......
Shri .P.ABHIMANYU, GS .Shri .P.ASOKBABU Dy.GS, and Shri.SWAPAN CHAKRA BORTHY,AGS .Presented the note to the Sr GM(Estt) on modifications to NEPP......
Large circle Awardto KARNATAKA....
Midium circle Award to CHENNAI .....
Small circle Award to ORISSA and HIMACHAL PRADESH......
THESE CIRCLES ARE GENERATED MORE REVENUE IN THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2010-11...
THE JTO(O)ASSOCIATION BSNL INDIA HEARTILY CONGRATULATIONS TO BSNL FAMILY OF ALL THESE CIRCLES.////////
BSNL EU given a letter to the bsnl management TSM regularised in BSNL be treated as DOT recruitees for the purpose of granting promotion under NEPP.......
Shri .P.ABHIMANYU, GS .Shri .P.ASOKBABU Dy.GS, and Shri.SWAPAN CHAKRA BORTHY,AGS .Presented the note to the Sr GM(Estt) on modifications to NEPP......
2011/05/26
NATIONAL COUNCIL MEETIN ON 24/06/2011
The 25th National Council Meeting on 24th may 2011 at corporate office central coordinator attending the same,before one day kabeer das meet personally to NC members in New DELHI.regularly contacting with main leaders in phone and personal.
The Chandigarh court case COCP. 1431/2008 ORGUED ON 11/07/2011..............
The NEW DELHI court case FR 22(1)(A)(1) ON 30/05/2011.........
The Chandigarh court case COCP. 1431/2008 ORGUED ON 11/07/2011..............
The NEW DELHI court case FR 22(1)(A)(1) ON 30/05/2011.........
2011/05/11
NATIONAL COUNCIL MEETING ON 03/06/2011
NATIONAL COUNCIL MEETING OF BSNL WILL BE HELD ON 3rd JUNE 2011 ,....
Our Central coordinator attending the meeting and one day before meet the all NC Members for our long pending ligitimate demand of Regularisation of jto's all over the country.
DELHI HIGH COURT CASE OF ...FR 22 (1)A(1) WILL BE HEARED ON 28TH MAY 2011.
CHANDIGADH COURT CASE COCP WILLBE HEARED ON 18TH MAY 2011......
Our Central coordinator attending the meeting and one day before meet the all NC Members for our long pending ligitimate demand of Regularisation of jto's all over the country.
DELHI HIGH COURT CASE OF ...FR 22 (1)A(1) WILL BE HEARED ON 28TH MAY 2011.
CHANDIGADH COURT CASE COCP WILLBE HEARED ON 18TH MAY 2011......
2011/05/02
NEW CMD OF BSNL Shri R.K Upadyaya
We heartily congratulate and welcome our new CMD BSNL Shri R K Upadya .
After submitting of Review Petition by BSNL, The Principal Bench New Delhi FR22(1) A(1) Case was heard on 29/04/2011and it was posted for argument on 30/05/11.The case may get disposed or they might give some direction for implementing the judgement given by Ernakulam Kerala for all Officiating jto's.
Re-constitution of National Council-Staff side/Official side members.
Official side
Director (HR) -Chairman
Executive Director(Finance) -Member
Sr. GM (PF&FC) -Member
Sr. GM (Estt) -Member
Sr. GM(pERS) -Member
Sr. GM(Admn) -Member
Sr. GM(SR) -Member
GM(EF) -Member
DGM(SR) -Convener
Staff Side
1.Sri V A N Namboodri -Leader, Staff side
2.Sri P Abhimanyu -Secratary,Staff side
3.Shri P Asokababu -Member
4.Shri J Sampath Rao -Member
5.Shri B S Raghuwanshi -Member
6.Shri Vijendra Singh -Member
7.Shri V Subburaman -Member
8.Shri R Venkataraman -Member
9.Shri Suresh Kumar -Member
10.Shri A R Safi -Member
11. Shri R Raveendran -Member
12.Shri B R Jakhatia -Member
13.Shri R K Kohli -Member
14.Shri P Andiappan -Member
BSNL EU SUBMITTED NATIONAL COUNCIL AGENDA WITH 32 ITEMS AND ASKED FOR 2 DAYS TIME FOR DISCUSSION,( OUT OF 32 , 3 OF OUR POINTS WERE INCLUDED, FR 35, FR22(1)A(1), AND PERSONNEL UP GRADITION). KABEERDAS
After submitting of Review Petition by BSNL, The Principal Bench New Delhi FR22(1) A(1) Case was heard on 29/04/2011and it was posted for argument on 30/05/11.The case may get disposed or they might give some direction for implementing the judgement given by Ernakulam Kerala for all Officiating jto's.
Re-constitution of National Council-Staff side/Official side members.
Official side
Director (HR) -Chairman
Executive Director(Finance) -Member
Sr. GM (PF&FC) -Member
Sr. GM (Estt) -Member
Sr. GM(pERS) -Member
Sr. GM(Admn) -Member
Sr. GM(SR) -Member
GM(EF) -Member
DGM(SR) -Convener
Staff Side
1.Sri V A N Namboodri -Leader, Staff side
2.Sri P Abhimanyu -Secratary,Staff side
3.Shri P Asokababu -Member
4.Shri J Sampath Rao -Member
5.Shri B S Raghuwanshi -Member
6.Shri Vijendra Singh -Member
7.Shri V Subburaman -Member
8.Shri R Venkataraman -Member
9.Shri Suresh Kumar -Member
10.Shri A R Safi -Member
11. Shri R Raveendran -Member
12.Shri B R Jakhatia -Member
13.Shri R K Kohli -Member
14.Shri P Andiappan -Member
BSNL EU SUBMITTED NATIONAL COUNCIL AGENDA WITH 32 ITEMS AND ASKED FOR 2 DAYS TIME FOR DISCUSSION,( OUT OF 32 , 3 OF OUR POINTS WERE INCLUDED, FR 35, FR22(1)A(1), AND PERSONNEL UP GRADITION). KABEERDAS
2011/04/25
NATIONAL COUNCIL MEETING/ PERSONAL UPGRADATION/ LIC EXAMINATION
Today is the submitting agenda for the next national council meeting which is expected to be in the month of june 2nd week. The BSNL EU Sri P Abhimanyu General Secretary, Sri P Asok Babu Deputy General Secretary and Sri VAN Nambodri Leaders staff side have seriously discussed and took up our issue of Personal Up gradation of left out JTO(O) .
The COCP 1431/2008 management BSNL is submitting another Affidavit in the Chandigarh High Court which is to be heard on 18th may 2011.
All the National Council Members are nominated by BSNL EU,14 members from staff side and 9 officers from management side . The staff side leader VAN Nambodri and steering committee chairman Suresh Kumar, Shri R Venkatraman, National Council Member and Shri P Asok Babu deeply studied our case and are interacting with Kabeer Das ,Central Coordinator.
The BSNL Management is going to form a new Board of Directors after nominating of new CMD BSNL .The directors are expecting 6 from outside ,2 from DOT and 2 from BSNL.
The LIC examination 35% and 15% judgement delivered by Honorable ERNAKULAM CAT KERALA for conducting examination with year wise vacancies and service condition as per 2001 JTO RR and amendment rules.We hope that within 3months Notification will be issued.
For any further information contact central , state coordinators.
The COCP 1431/2008 management BSNL is submitting another Affidavit in the Chandigarh High Court which is to be heard on 18th may 2011.
All the National Council Members are nominated by BSNL EU,14 members from staff side and 9 officers from management side . The staff side leader VAN Nambodri and steering committee chairman Suresh Kumar, Shri R Venkatraman, National Council Member and Shri P Asok Babu deeply studied our case and are interacting with Kabeer Das ,Central Coordinator.
The BSNL Management is going to form a new Board of Directors after nominating of new CMD BSNL .The directors are expecting 6 from outside ,2 from DOT and 2 from BSNL.
The LIC examination 35% and 15% judgement delivered by Honorable ERNAKULAM CAT KERALA for conducting examination with year wise vacancies and service condition as per 2001 JTO RR and amendment rules.We hope that within 3months Notification will be issued.
For any further information contact central , state coordinators.
2011/04/19
CWC MEETING AND DELHI NEWS
THE CENTRAL COORDINATORS MEETING WAS HELD AT BTEF OFFIE,T-15 ATULGROVE ROAD ,NEW DELHI ON 19-04-11 AT 11:30 AM.THE FOLLOWING OFFICE BEARERS AND STATE COORDINATORS ATTENDED THE MEETING AND DISCUSSED ABOUT OUR LONG PENDING,LEGITIMATE & JUSTIFIED DEMANDS AND RESOLVED TO GET REGULARISATION OF LEFTOUT JTOs ALL OVER INDIA .
THE STATE COORDINATORS ATTENDED THE MEETING ARE:
1)SRI.Y.RAMAKRISHNA RAO,SRI.M.RAJENDER REDDY AND SRI.G.RAGHAVENDRA RAO FROM ANDHRAPRADESH.
2)SRI.R.ADAM,SRI.MANIKANTAN FROM TAMILNADU
3)SRI. RAMACHANDRA AND SRI.RAMKRISHNA FROM KARNATAKA
4)SRI.U.K.TRIPATHI AND SRI.SRIVATSAV FROM UP
5)SRI.P.S.CHANDA FROM RAJASTAN
6)SRI. B.A.RAO AND SRI.PARIKH FROM GUJARAT
7)SRI.DOKLE FROM INDOOR
SRI.Y.RAMAKRISHNA RAO ,PRESEDENT OJTO ASSN HAS GIVEN WELCOME ADDRESS AND EXPLAINED THE ISSUES.THE CENTRAL COORDINATOR SRI.KABEERDAS EXPLAINED IN DETAILED ABOUT THE COURT CASES AND PRESENT STATUS OF OUR ISSUE.ALL THE STATE COORDINATORS ALSO EXPRESSED THEIR VIEWS AND ALSO GAVE SOME IMPORTANT SUJJESSIONS TO GET OUR PROBLEMS SOLVED.
THE STATE COORDINATORS WHO WERE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING SEND MESSAGES IN SUPPORT OF US AND ALSO HAVE DISCUSSED THE ISSUES OVER PHONE AND ASSUERED FULL COOPERATION TO CENTRAL CWC.
AFTER THE MEETING ALL THE COORDINATORS MET SRI.P.ASHOKBABU ,AGS,BSNLEU AT ROOM NO:706(CONFERENCE HALL) AT CORPORATE OFFICE AND HAVE DETAILED DISCUSSIONS WERE HELD WITH HIM.HE PROMISED ,IN THIS WEEK HE IS GOING TO GIVE A LETTER TO THE MANAGEMENT ON OUR ISSUES AND HE IS EXPECTING THAT FINAL DISCUSSIONS WILL TAKE PLACE FROM NEXT MONTH ONWORDS.HE ALSO ASSUERED FOR REGULARISATION OF US AFTER THE COCP AT CHANDIGARH CLOSURE.
TOMORROW MORNING THE SAME DELIGATION IS GOING TO MEET SRI.P.ABHIMANYU G/S BSNLEU AT SHADIPUR UNION OFFICE AND WE ARE GOING TO GIVE FULL DETAILS ON OUR ISSUE.
THE CENTRAL COORDINATOR MET TODAY SRI.BEDI AND CONCERENED OFFICERS IN PERSONNEL SECTION REGARDING FR22(1)A1 AND CONTEMPT CASES,ALSO DISCUSSED ABOUT EARNAKULAM CAT JUDGEMENT ON JTO LICE.
DON'T GET NERVOUS WE ARE VERY NEAR TO OUR GOAL WHICH IS GOING TO BE ACHIEVED SHORTLY........KABEERDAS
THE STATE COORDINATORS ATTENDED THE MEETING ARE:
1)SRI.Y.RAMAKRISHNA RAO,SRI.M.RAJENDER REDDY AND SRI.G.RAGHAVENDRA RAO FROM ANDHRAPRADESH.
2)SRI.R.ADAM,SRI.MANIKANTAN FROM TAMILNADU
3)SRI. RAMACHANDRA AND SRI.RAMKRISHNA FROM KARNATAKA
4)SRI.U.K.TRIPATHI AND SRI.SRIVATSAV FROM UP
5)SRI.P.S.CHANDA FROM RAJASTAN
6)SRI. B.A.RAO AND SRI.PARIKH FROM GUJARAT
7)SRI.DOKLE FROM INDOOR
SRI.Y.RAMAKRISHNA RAO ,PRESEDENT OJTO ASSN HAS GIVEN WELCOME ADDRESS AND EXPLAINED THE ISSUES.THE CENTRAL COORDINATOR SRI.KABEERDAS EXPLAINED IN DETAILED ABOUT THE COURT CASES AND PRESENT STATUS OF OUR ISSUE.ALL THE STATE COORDINATORS ALSO EXPRESSED THEIR VIEWS AND ALSO GAVE SOME IMPORTANT SUJJESSIONS TO GET OUR PROBLEMS SOLVED.
THE STATE COORDINATORS WHO WERE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING SEND MESSAGES IN SUPPORT OF US AND ALSO HAVE DISCUSSED THE ISSUES OVER PHONE AND ASSUERED FULL COOPERATION TO CENTRAL CWC.
AFTER THE MEETING ALL THE COORDINATORS MET SRI.P.ASHOKBABU ,AGS,BSNLEU AT ROOM NO:706(CONFERENCE HALL) AT CORPORATE OFFICE AND HAVE DETAILED DISCUSSIONS WERE HELD WITH HIM.HE PROMISED ,IN THIS WEEK HE IS GOING TO GIVE A LETTER TO THE MANAGEMENT ON OUR ISSUES AND HE IS EXPECTING THAT FINAL DISCUSSIONS WILL TAKE PLACE FROM NEXT MONTH ONWORDS.HE ALSO ASSUERED FOR REGULARISATION OF US AFTER THE COCP AT CHANDIGARH CLOSURE.
TOMORROW MORNING THE SAME DELIGATION IS GOING TO MEET SRI.P.ABHIMANYU G/S BSNLEU AT SHADIPUR UNION OFFICE AND WE ARE GOING TO GIVE FULL DETAILS ON OUR ISSUE.
THE CENTRAL COORDINATOR MET TODAY SRI.BEDI AND CONCERENED OFFICERS IN PERSONNEL SECTION REGARDING FR22(1)A1 AND CONTEMPT CASES,ALSO DISCUSSED ABOUT EARNAKULAM CAT JUDGEMENT ON JTO LICE.
DON'T GET NERVOUS WE ARE VERY NEAR TO OUR GOAL WHICH IS GOING TO BE ACHIEVED SHORTLY........KABEERDAS
CHANDIGARG CASE STATUS
THE CHANDIGARH COURT COCP-1431/2008 WAS HEARD ON 18-04-11 AND BSNL HAS SUBMITTED FRESH AFFIDAVIT ,THE JUDGE ASKED FOR MODIFICATIONS IN THE AFFIDAVIT AND ASKED TO SUBMIT TO COURT AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE AND GIVEN NEXT HEARING DATE ON 18-05-11.
WE WERE PRESENT THERE AND AS PER THE PROCEEDINGS WE ARE EXPECTING THE CASE WILL BE SETTLED SHORTLY
WE ARE GOING TO MEET ALL UNITED FRONT LEADERS AND OTHER UNION LEADERS ALSO AT DELHI ON 19-04-11 TO GET OUR ISSUE TO BE SOLVED EARLY...KABEERDAS
WE WERE PRESENT THERE AND AS PER THE PROCEEDINGS WE ARE EXPECTING THE CASE WILL BE SETTLED SHORTLY
WE ARE GOING TO MEET ALL UNITED FRONT LEADERS AND OTHER UNION LEADERS ALSO AT DELHI ON 19-04-11 TO GET OUR ISSUE TO BE SOLVED EARLY...KABEERDAS
2011/04/16
CHANDIGARH COURT CASE DETAILS
THE CHANDIGARH COURT CASE ON DIVERSION ISSUE WITH SL NO:COCP-1431-2008 BETWEEN DEEPAK VERMA & ORS V/S KULDEEP GOYAL & ORS WAS POSTED FOR NEXT HEARING ON MONDAY DATED 18/04/2011 IN COURT HALL NO:CR NO 14
AND WILL BE HEARD BY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA.
WE ARE AT CHANDIGARH TO SEE THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CASE...KABEERDAS
2011/04/11
EARNAKULAM CAT JUDGEMENT REG
Stay on conducting LICE-JTO based on JTO RR 2001 has been lifted consequent on final verdict in OA No: 224/2010 and connected cases dated
1) The year wise distribution of vacancy under 35% and 15% quota viz 2001 to 2009 is to be notified as is done by BSNL West Bengal Circle. (Para14).
2) Amendment of service condition from 10 years to 7 years is valid. However, the vacancies which were occurred prior to the amendment of the rule during March 2009, would be governed by the pre-amendment provisions, i.e, amendments can have prospective effect only.
3) The eligibility to participate in examination against the vacancies of particular year is to be determined with reference to a crucial date relevant to the year of occurrence of vacancy (say 1st of July) rather date conducting examination.
This is also a good news for us as all the vacancies prior to 2009 will be have minimum 10 years of service condition,so these vacancies can be filled by dept candidates who have 10 years service or can be left vaccant if not filled.
ALL THE STATE COORDINATORS ARE MEETING AT DELHI ON 19-04-2011 TO FINALISE OUR ISSUES....KABEERDAS
2011/04/09
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
THE DELHI HIGH COURT CASE ON FR22(1)A1 IS AGAIN POSTED FOR NEXT HEARING ON 29-04-11.
ALL THE STATE COORDINATORS MEETING WILL BE HELD AT DELHI ON 19-04-11,ALL THE COORDINATORS ARE REQUESTED TO COME UP ALONG THE DETAILS OF ACTUAL LEFTOUT OJTOs FIGURES.
ON 09-04-11 THE SSA COORDINATORS MEETING OF BANGALORE SSA AND KARNATAKA STATE WILL BE HELD AT TELECOM BUILDING,BASAVESWARA CIRCLE,NEAR CHALUKYA HOTEL,BANGALORE.ALL THE SSA COORDINATORS OF KARNATAKA ARE REQUESTED TO PARTICIPATE TO HAVE LATEST DEVELPOMENTS AND FUTURE COURSE OF ACTION DETAILS....KABEERDAS
ALL THE STATE COORDINATORS MEETING WILL BE HELD AT DELHI ON 19-04-11,ALL THE COORDINATORS ARE REQUESTED TO COME UP ALONG THE DETAILS OF ACTUAL LEFTOUT OJTOs FIGURES.
ON 09-04-11 THE SSA COORDINATORS MEETING OF BANGALORE SSA AND KARNATAKA STATE WILL BE HELD AT TELECOM BUILDING,BASAVESWARA CIRCLE,NEAR CHALUKYA HOTEL,BANGALORE.ALL THE SSA COORDINATORS OF KARNATAKA ARE REQUESTED TO PARTICIPATE TO HAVE LATEST DEVELPOMENTS AND FUTURE COURSE OF ACTION DETAILS....KABEERDAS
2011/04/06
LATEST NEWS
YESTERDAY I MYSELF ALONG OTHER OJTOs PARTICIPATED IN GATE DEMONSTRATIONS CALLED BY JAC AT HYDERABAD AGAINST CRS/VRS,REDUCING SERVICE AGE FROM 60 YEARS TO 58 YEARS,ITI MERGER IN BSNL AND REDUCTION IN ALLOWANCES PROPOSED BY BSNL MANAGEMENT.THE PROGRAM WAS A GRAND SUCESS.
ON THE SAME DAY WE MR.KABEERDAS ,MR.RAHIMUDDIN,PRASAD,RAMAKRISHNA AND RAGHAVENDRA RAO HAVE DISCUSSIONS WITH SRI.ASHOKBABU OF BSNLEU ON PERSONNEL UPGRADATION AND NEPP IMPLEMENTATION FOR TTAs,PAY SCALES OF OFFICIALS WHO GOT PROMPTION BEFORE 2000,PAY SCALES OF 7100,AND OTBP SCALE FOR TTAs FOR NEARLY ONE AND HALF HOUR.THEY ELOBARATELY DISCUSSED THE ISSUES.
WE ARE MEETING AT DELHI ON 19-04-2011 FOR FURTHER DISCUSSIONS...KABEERDAS
ON THE SAME DAY WE MR.KABEERDAS ,MR.RAHIMUDDIN,PRASAD,RAMAKRISHNA AND RAGHAVENDRA RAO HAVE DISCUSSIONS WITH SRI.ASHOKBABU OF BSNLEU ON PERSONNEL UPGRADATION AND NEPP IMPLEMENTATION FOR TTAs,PAY SCALES OF OFFICIALS WHO GOT PROMPTION BEFORE 2000,PAY SCALES OF 7100,AND OTBP SCALE FOR TTAs FOR NEARLY ONE AND HALF HOUR.THEY ELOBARATELY DISCUSSED THE ISSUES.
WE ARE MEETING AT DELHI ON 19-04-2011 FOR FURTHER DISCUSSIONS...KABEERDAS
2011/03/24
LATEST NEWS
ON THE OCCATION OF 10TH BSNL FORMATION DAY CELEBRATIONS ,A GRAND MEETING WAS HELD AT HYDERABAD IN WHICH ALL PROMINENT MEMBERS OF BSNLEU,JOINT FORUM PRESENTED,I KABEERDAS AND RAJENDERREDDY ALSO PARTICIPATED .FLAG HOISTING WAS HELD BY CIRCLE SECRETARY BSNLEU.
REGARDING OUR ISSUES SRI.SURESH KUMAR OF BSNL MS MET CMD BSNL AND HAVE DISCUSSIONS IN POSITIVE MANNER NEARLY FOR HALF AN HOUR ,AND CMD TOLD THAT AFTER RETURNING FROM WASHIGTON HE WILL TAKE UP THE ISSUE.
SRI.ASHOKBABU OF BSNLEU ALSO HAVE HELD DISCUSSIONS WITH ESTABLISHMENT SECTION AND WITH LEGAL SECTION AND PRESENTED ALL THE VITAL ISSUES OF OUR REGULARISATION AND FR22(1)A1 SCALE FIXATION.WE HOPE ALL THE THINGS WILL BE SORTED OUT EARLY........KABEERDAS
REGARDING OUR ISSUES SRI.SURESH KUMAR OF BSNL MS MET CMD BSNL AND HAVE DISCUSSIONS IN POSITIVE MANNER NEARLY FOR HALF AN HOUR ,AND CMD TOLD THAT AFTER RETURNING FROM WASHIGTON HE WILL TAKE UP THE ISSUE.
SRI.ASHOKBABU OF BSNLEU ALSO HAVE HELD DISCUSSIONS WITH ESTABLISHMENT SECTION AND WITH LEGAL SECTION AND PRESENTED ALL THE VITAL ISSUES OF OUR REGULARISATION AND FR22(1)A1 SCALE FIXATION.WE HOPE ALL THE THINGS WILL BE SORTED OUT EARLY........KABEERDAS
2011/03/15
CENTRAL WORKING COMMITTEE MEETING AT HYDERABAD
The central working committee meeting held in hyderabad at SANGM HOTEL RTC X ROADS CHIKKAD PALLY HYDERABAD ON 13/03/2011 SUNDAY.Welcome address by Sri Y RAMAKRISHNA RAO President All india JTO(O)A BSNL I,
The Present Latest Development of our Regularisation of JTO,FR 22(1)a(1),LICE Exam ,Court Cases position ect.Explained by Central coordinator N.KABEER DAS.
All state coordinators S/S R ADAM,BABU,ANJANAVANNAN ,RAFEEQUE TAMILNADU,BD VANI MAHARASHTRA,RAMCHANDRAN,GANGADHAR KARNATAKA,G RAGHAVENDER RAO U KANAKA RAJU Y RAMAKRISHNA RAO ANDHRAPRADESH Expressed their views after that unanimously ressoled that Speedup of our Regularisation/Personnel up gradation Through UNITED FORUM /NATIONAL COUNCIL MEMBERS , it is also resoled that in the month of April all state coordinators meet to united forum leaders .
The Present Latest Development of our Regularisation of JTO,FR 22(1)a(1),LICE Exam ,Court Cases position ect.Explained by Central coordinator N.KABEER DAS.
All state coordinators S/S R ADAM,BABU,ANJANAVANNAN ,RAFEEQUE TAMILNADU,BD VANI MAHARASHTRA,RAMCHANDRAN,GANGADHAR KARNATAKA,G RAGHAVENDER RAO U KANAKA RAJU Y RAMAKRISHNA RAO ANDHRAPRADESH Expressed their views after that unanimously ressoled that Speedup of our Regularisation/Personnel up gradation Through UNITED FORUM /NATIONAL COUNCIL MEMBERS , it is also resoled that in the month of April all state coordinators meet to united forum leaders .
2011/03/11
CENTRAL WORKING COMMITTE MEETING
The JTO(O)ASSOCIATION BSNL INDIA Central Working Committee meeting will be held at HYDERABAD at MUSHEERA BAD TEL EXCHANGE on 13/03/2011 SUNDAY .
The committee will discus about action plan of our regularisation of jto and FR 22(1)a(1).All the united forum leaders and NC members are deeply studying regarding left out jto"s.
The committee will discus about action plan of our regularisation of jto and FR 22(1)a(1).All the united forum leaders and NC members are deeply studying regarding left out jto"s.
2011/03/08
FR22(1)A1 CASE DETAILS
BSNL MANAGEMENT HAS FILED REVIEW APPLICATION ON FR22(1)A1 CASE WHICH WAS HEARD ON 28-02-11 AND DISPOSED WIDE CASE NO:1339/2011.IT WAS PROTESTED BY OUR ADVOCATE AND NEXT HEARING WAS POSTED TO 28-03-2011 TO CONSIDER OR NOT TO CONSIDER DEPT REVIEW APPLICATION...KABEERDAS
DELHI HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT FOR CASE ON FR22(1)A1 HELD ON 28-02-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
40
W.P.(C) 1339/2011
BSNL and ORS .....
Petitioners
Through: Mr.Sameer Aggarwal, Advocate
versus
BSNL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (REGD) and ANR.
..... Respondents
Through: Ms.Rani Chawla, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
O R D E R
28.02.2011
CM No.2848/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
WP(C) No.1339/2011 and CM No.2847/2011
Heard Mr.Sameer Aggarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
It is submitted by him that the tribunal has erroneously placed reliance on the decision rendered by the Ernakulam Bench in the matter of M.V.Salilakumar and Ors. v. The Chairman and Managing Director and Ors.,
W.P.(C) 1339/2011 whereas the factual matrix is absolutely different and the said decision is not
applicable to the case at hand.
On a perusal of the order passed by the tribunal, we do not perceive that this stand has been taken before the tribunal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the stand was taken but the same has not been adverted to in the order.
Regard being had to the aforesaid submission, we are inclined to grant liberty to the petitioner to file an application for review under Section 22(F) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
We may hasten to add that we have not dwelled upon the merits of the contentions as we have granted liberty to file an application for review.
With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition as well as the application stand disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
SANJIV KHANNA, J
FEBRUARY 28, 2011
Sv
W.P.(C) 1339/2011
CONDOLANCE MESSAGE
WE ARE SORRY TO INFORM THAT OUR OFFICIATING JTO FROM VADODARA ,GUJARAT Mr.H.J.PATEL EXPIRED DUE TO MASSIVE HEART FAILURE ON 07/03/2011.WE CONVEY OUR DEEPEST CONDOLANCE AND PRAY ALLMIGHTY TO GIVE STRENGH TO HIS FAMILY AND FRIENDS TO BEAR THE LOSE...KABEERDAS
2011/03/05
EXECUTIVE MEETING
The next executive meeting of JTO(O)ASSOCIATION BSNL INDIA will be held at HYDERABAD on 13th MARCH Sunday, All state coordinators are requested to make arrangements for tickets well in advance, If any coordinator is not attending the meeting kindly send any representative on behalf of your circle and also you are requested to come along the latestest figures of your Circle/SSA wise left out JTO's officiating official figures.
PRESENT JTO(O) ALL OVER THE COUNTRY OFFICIAL FIGURES 2173/ACTUAL IS 1900
NAME OF THE CIRCLE: ACTUAL FIGURE
KERALA 398
KARNATAKA 316
ANDHRAPRADESH 293
TAMILNADU 258
MAHARASHTRA 208
MP/CHATTISGARH 163
GUJARATH 107
KOLKATTA TEL DIST 104
WEST BENGAL 95
RAJASTHAN 75
UP EAST 70
CHENNAI TEL DIST 53
HARYANA 24
J&K 9
Present in AP circle only 249 out of 293 is the actual figure,So please get actual figures of your circle to project to corporate office
.
CONGRATULATIONS to the newly elected steering committee members of UNITED FORUM and.Sri SURESHKUMAR Elected chairman of the committee ,We on behalf of JTO(O)A BSNL I CONGRATULATE ALL THE MEMBERS
Sri ASHOK BABU Dy G/S and N/C member deeply studied our issue of Regularisation and we hope our goal is very near............KABEERDAS
PRESENT JTO(O) ALL OVER THE COUNTRY OFFICIAL FIGURES 2173/ACTUAL IS 1900
NAME OF THE CIRCLE: ACTUAL FIGURE
KERALA 398
KARNATAKA 316
ANDHRAPRADESH 293
TAMILNADU 258
MAHARASHTRA 208
MP/CHATTISGARH 163
GUJARATH 107
KOLKATTA TEL DIST 104
WEST BENGAL 95
RAJASTHAN 75
UP EAST 70
CHENNAI TEL DIST 53
HARYANA 24
J&K 9
Present in AP circle only 249 out of 293 is the actual figure,So please get actual figures of your circle to project to corporate office
.
CONGRATULATIONS to the newly elected steering committee members of UNITED FORUM and.Sri SURESHKUMAR Elected chairman of the committee ,We on behalf of JTO(O)A BSNL I CONGRATULATE ALL THE MEMBERS
Sri ASHOK BABU Dy G/S and N/C member deeply studied our issue of Regularisation and we hope our goal is very near............KABEERDAS
2011/03/01
FR22(1)A1 CASE DETAILS AT DELHI HIGH COURT
THE FR22(1)A1 CASE FILED BY BSNL MANAGEMENT IN DELHI HIGH COURT ON 28.02.2011 AT COURT NO. 1(DIVISION BENCH-1) COMPRISING HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA WITH SL NO:40 AND CASE NO:WP(C) -1339/2011 (CM APPL NO:2847-2848/2011) BETWEEN BSNL AND ORS VS . BSNL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION (REGD) AND ANR WAS DISMISSED AT INITIAL STAGE AS PER OUR ADVOCATE SMT.RANICHABRA AND DEPT MAY FILE REVIEW APPEAL IN FULL DIVISION BENCH….KABEERDAS
FLASH NEWS ON FR22(1)A1
FLASH FLASH FLASH FLASH:
ONE MORE VICTORY FOR US:
AS PER OUR LAYWER SMT.RANICHABRA THE WRIT PETETION FILED BY BSNL MANAGEMENT IN THE FR22(1)A(1) CASE IN DELHI HIGH COURT IS DISMISSED TODAY.BSNL MANAGEMENT MAY FILE ANOTHER REVIEW PETETION AND WE ARE TRYING TO GET IT DISMISSED AS PER OUR LAYWER Smt. RANICHABRA…KABEERDAS
ONE MORE VICTORY FOR US:
AS PER OUR LAYWER SMT.RANICHABRA THE WRIT PETETION FILED BY BSNL MANAGEMENT IN THE FR22(1)A(1) CASE IN DELHI HIGH COURT IS DISMISSED TODAY.BSNL MANAGEMENT MAY FILE ANOTHER REVIEW PETETION AND WE ARE TRYING TO GET IT DISMISSED AS PER OUR LAYWER Smt. RANICHABRA…KABEERDAS
CONGRATULATIONS TO SHRI.S.C.MISRA
28-02-2011 THE CHANDIGARH CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (COCP 1431/2008 ) WITH SERIAL NO. 3 IN COURT NO. 14 IN CHANDIGARH WAS HEARD YESTERDAY AND AGAIN POSTED FOR 18TH APRIL 2011 WITHOUT ANY ARGUMENTS...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)